[asterisk-users] Large number of prefixes in a route to a trunk
Jason Fuermann
jbf005 at shsu.edu
Thu Feb 8 07:46:28 MST 2007
We have a similar situation and we do a realtime lookup in an external
db, works like a champ
Steve Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 22:21 -0500, Lee Jenkins wrote:
>
>> Eric Germann wrote:
>>
>>> We're beginning to test MultiTech's CallFinder CDMA Units, one for Sprint
>>> PCS and one for Alltel. They sell both. Our intent is to use them as a
>>> backup line for our main office (which has a PRI) and a backup/911 line for
>>> our remote offices which are all connected via * over a VPN with no local
>>> trunks at any of them.
>>>
>>> In the interest of maximizing use of the lines, I'm putting together a dial
>>> plan that includes PCS-to-PCS/Nextel calling for the Sprint trunk.
>>> Essentially, the PBX would look like a cell phone to the PCS cloud. Total
>>> merged NPA-NXX list for SPCS I come up with is around 7,600 prefixes. Since
>>> our parent has offices strung out all over the US and is standardizing on
>>> SPCS, it makes sense to try and leverage as many PCS-to-PCS calls as we can.
>>> Alltel comes in at around 1940 prefixes.
>>>
>>> Has anyone found a soft limit for what * can handle in an outbound route
>>> associated with a trunk? The box that does the routing is a new quad core
>>> with 2GB of RAM. Any recommendations for whether to use the straight
>>> extensions_XXXXX.conf or write a custom dialplan with a db hook in it? I'm
>>> sort of in favor of the *.conf files since they remove an external
>>> dependency from the dialplan, if the speed is reasonable, but a prefix list
>>> like this is new territory for me.
>>>
>>> If anyone is interested, drop me an email and I will be happy to share the
>>> NPA-NXX extracts for Alltel Wireless, Sprint PCS and Nextel in CSV format.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance and I will be happy to share with anyone or the list if
>>> there is interest in our experience with the devices (they're relatively
>>> new)
>>>
>>>
>> I'd be curious in how asterisk would handle that. That seems like an
>> awful lot for asterisk to sift through although I'm sure there is some
>> hashing going on inside somewhere. With a db, you get to use an index,
>> but then have to be concerned about the time it takes to establish a
>> connection, extra resources used, etc.
>>
>> Maybe the built in AstDB would be an option to look at as well?
>>
>>
>
> personally, I'd think a few thousand entries in the AstDB would be no
> big deal;
> it's based on DB1, and should handle this kind of thing with no
> problems!!
>
> I'd think it's worth investigating, at any rate! You'll have to look at
> factors like query rate, db size, whether or not multiple clients are
> necessary, etc. etc.
>
> murf
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070208/0c224c3f/attachment.htm
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list