[asterisk-users] Re: kewlstart disconnect threshold

[Chris Earle]

Can anyone confirm that it actually works in Singapore with Busy Detect?

I have a system with loopstart and BusyDetect and have recently attempted to
improve disconnect detection results with the addition of
hanguponpolarityswitch ... results are mixed


--
Chris Earle
System Solutions Specialist



"Leo Ann Boon" <leo at datvoiz.com> wrote in message
news:45C52681.2060205 at datvoiz.com...
> Stephen Bosch wrote:
> > The reason we have these complaints is not because Asterisk doesn't
> > detect the drop -- it's because a great many telephone companies don't
> > do remote party disconnect signalling, or they don't do it properly.
> > When people call for technical assistance they usually end up talking
> > with someone who has no idea what Calling Party Control or remote party
> > disconnect actually is.
> >
> > Case in point:
> >
> > I am with Telus in Alberta, Canada. By default, the "loop drop" (it's
> > actually a battery drop, as near as I can tell, but kewlstart will
> > detect both) occurs after more than a minute. On some lines it doesn't
> >
> A minute is rather long. CPC when working should be almost immediate
> (see Mark's kewlstart test). What happens if you change it to loopstart?
> Does asterisk detect the drop?
>
> My analog line with Singapore Starhub does a battery drop after about
> 90s (i can hear a short crackling sound), but it's not detectable (no
> console message with verbose >6)  unless I set to kewlstart. Not even
> with hanguponpolarityswitch=yes. So, I guess zaptel doesn't do anything
> if you set signaling to loopstart.
>
> The long and short of it, busydetect maybe the best solution to force
> asterisk to hangup after the remote party hung up.
>
> Leo
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>