[asterisk-users] Leading 0 in PRI outbound
Rajeev Natarajan
twogigbox at gmail.com
Tue Dec 18 23:32:43 CST 2007
Yeah: we are using pridialplan=local - am using AsteriskNOW by the way. Does
it require some kind of a patch? for it to understand 'pridialplan' ?
My pri intense debug shows:
> Calling Number (len= 4) [ Ext: 0 TON: National Number (2) NPI:
ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1)
> Presentation: Number not available (67) '' ]
> [70 0b a1 39 37 38 39 30 39 31 30 31 31]
> Called Number (len=13) [ Ext: 1 TON: National Number (2) NPI:
ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) '9789091011' ]
Thanks
Rajeev
On Dec 19, 2007 3:47 AM, Tilghman Lesher <tilghman at mail.jeffandtilghman.com>
wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 December 2007 15:22:18 Rajeev Natarajan wrote:
> > We have a PRI line setup on an asterisk box using TE110P. Both outbound
> and
> > inbound are working fine BUT the provider claims that all our numbers
> come
> > prefixed with a '0' (in India a 0 prefix indicates long distance) and
> that
> > could become an issue with local calls.
>
> What is pridialplan set to in zapata.conf? This value sets an extra 4
> bits in
> the PRI dialog between you and the telco. And typically, if you have it
> set
> to something like 'national', the telco will tell you you have numbers
> prefixed, even when you don't, because their switch software is written to
> make the translation.
>
> So what most people do (and what works most often) is to set pridialplan
> to
> 'unknown', which sets the bit field to all zeros and the number isn't
> prefixed
> at all at the telco switch, but simply routed based upon the number sent.
>
> --
> Tilghman
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20071219/882fd7fc/attachment.htm
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list