[asterisk-users] Upgrade to Asterisk 1.4 - it's one year's old!
Philipp Kempgen
philipp.kempgen at amooma.de
Sat Dec 15 11:26:18 CST 2007
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> If anything broke from the transition from 1.2 to 1.4, it is because you were
> using something that was deprecated in 1.2. What we had attempted to do
> in deprecation modes was to print the warning ONCE for each deprecated
> operation, per Asterisk startup. I think that this was much too conservative.
> It is very easy to miss that deprecation warning, since it occurs so few
> times. Of course, the opposite side is that we don't want deprecation
> warnings to fill up your logs, so there's a balancing act here. But we could
> probably do with making the deprecation warnings a bit more prominent
> and print them multiple times (for example, every 10th usage). That should
> make it more clear that there's something to change.
A bit more prominent: yes.
Every 10th usage: no. I wouldn't want gcc/perl/php/... to
complain about deprecated syntax every 10th usage. IMHO that
would be really confusing.
And having to count those usages of deprecated things would
mean additional overhead.
> Of course, all of these deprecations should be covered in UPGRADE.txt
Definitely.
Regards,
Philipp Kempgen
--
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
Let's use IT to solve problems and not to create new ones.
Asterisk? -> http://www.das-asterisk-buch.de
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer
Handelsregister: Neuwied B 14998
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list