[asterisk-users] Most Stable version of Asterisk

[C F]

sorry, but that depends on much more than the version, while I have
never personally tried 1.4 the latest 1.2 works for me, however I have
never yet passed the stage of never as far as time goes, since
tomorrow is another day.
now to your problem, if you start asterisk with -cvvvvv at loading
what does it segfault?

On 12/11/07, Jai Rangi <jprangi at gmail.com> wrote:
> And that version name/number is ???
>
> :)
> -Jai
>
> On Dec 11, 2007 4:17 PM, C F <shmaltz at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > In my experience the most stable asterisk is the one that runs and
> > runs and never crashes.
> >
> > On 12/11/07, Jai Rangi <jprangi at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I tried to install the asterisk 1.4.15 and I am not able to start it. I
> > get
> > > the segmentation fault error. What might be wrong, where I can look for
> > a
> > > clue.
> > > Also could some one PLEASE suggest the most stable version of asterisk.
> > >
> > > -Jai
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
> >
> > asterisk-users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
>