[asterisk-users] [Fwd: [MailServer Notification]Content Filtering Notification]

[Steve Totaro]

This email has violated the PROFANITY.
and Quarantine entire message has been taken on 25/08/2007 21.00.49.
Message details:
Server:MAIL1RELAY
Sender: stotaro at totarotechnologies.com;
Recipient:asterisk-users at lists.digium.com;
Subject:Re: [asterisk-users] which OS would be fine for asterisk

WTH?!?  I see no profanity.


Trevor Peirce wrote:

> > Matthew Fredrickson wrote:
> >   
>   
>> >> Trevor Peirce wrote:
>> >>   
>> >>     
>>     
>>> >>> Hello,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Has anyone tried the combination of asterisk 1.2.24, zaptel 1.4.5 and 
>>> >>> HPEC 9.00.003?
>>> >>>     
>>> >>>       
>>>       
>> >> First of all... Why are you using zaptel 1.4.5 with asterisk 1.2?  That 
>> >> is a red flag in itself.
>> >>
>> >>   
>> >>     
>>     
> >
> > References:
> >
> > http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2007-January/177404.html
> >
> > There was another thread once upon a time where it was also indicated 
> > that there would not be any problems. Possibly the one Steve Totaro 
> > mentioned in another reply.
> >
> > The motivation behind this was to resolve echo issues using the newer 
> > echo can. When I finally was able to get some HPEC licenses it was 
> > easier to just keep using what had proved stable (which was zaptel 1.4 
> > with asterisk 1.2). Unfortunately the system started crashing often. I 
> > tested this on different hardware at the same facility and it crashed 
> > less often, but it still crashed.
> >
> > Now if it's a miracle that asterisk 1.2 and zaptel 1.4 could ever play 
> > nice together, that could explain it. But if there is nothing wrong with 
> > it, then I'd say this is a bug, hence why I asked if anyone else was 
> > using it in a similar manner.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Trevor
> >
> >   
>   
Just to make sure you saw this reply quoted from Tzafrir, seems to 
really know his stuff:
/
If you want to be able to build asterisk 1.2 with zaptel 1.4 you'll 
need: ln -s ../zaptel/zaptel.h /usr/include/linux/zaptel.h ln -s 
zaptel/tonezone.h /usr/include/tonezone.h Note: I'm not sure exactly 
what happens if you run a 'make install' of zaptel 1.2 on top of that 
later. I guess you should remove those two symlinks manually before you 
do that.
/
Thanks,
Steve Totaro/
/