[asterisk-users] Bristuffed asterisk 1.2.10 on Suse 10 - problemwith module versionmagic

[Paul Hewlett]

On Monday 18 September 2006 21:08, Robert Rozman wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Hewlett" <paul at cottonpickinminds.co.za>
> To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 3:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Bristuffed asterisk 1.2.10 on Suse 10 -
> problemwith module versionmagic
>
> > On Saturday 16 September 2006 20:35, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 02:58:02PM +0200, Robert Rozman wrote:
> >> > I'm banging my head on compiling bristuff modules for Suse 10.0 with
> >> > kernel
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Linux laps1 2.6.13-15.11-smp #1 SMP Mon Jul 17 09:43:01 UTC 2006
> >> > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > and Asterisk 1.2.10-BRIstuffed-0.3.0-PRE-1s.
> >> >
> >> > I get this :
> >> >
> >> > laps1:~/Voipy/Bristuff/bristuff-0.3.0-PRE-1s/zaptel # modprobe zaphfc
> >> > FATAL: Error inserting zaphfc
> >> > (/lib/modules/2.6.13-15.11-smp/misc/zaphfc.ko): Invalid module format
> >> >
> >> > and this in dmesg :
> >> >
> >> > zaphfc: version magic '2.6.13-15.11-smp gcc-4.0' should be
> >> > '2.6.13-15.11-smp SMP gcc-4.0'
> >>
> >> This means you built zaptel with the wrong kernel headers. Is there a
> >> SUSE power user in the crowd?
> >
> >  From memory as I do not use SUSE anymore..
> >
> >  Suse already has the zaptel modules in its kernel under the (IIRC) the
> > extra
> > directory (instead of misc) . you end up with 2 sets of zaptel modules in
> > the
> > linux module tree and modprobe then gets confused as to which to load.
> >
> > Look for a directory /lib/modules/2.6.13-15.11-smp/extra
> >
> > You must (again from memory) delete the old modules abd rerun depmod or
> > rebuild your asterisk
>
> Thanks for the hint. I already did that. To me it seems that something is
> messed up with settings, so zaphfc compiles with slightly different version
> magic - note that the problem lies only in 'SMP'   : '2.6.13-15.11-smp
> gcc-4.0'  vs '2.6.13-15.11-smp SMP gcc-4.0'
>
> That's weird for me....
>
> Any further help ?
>
  No sorry - I gave up on suSE at version 9.3...

Paul
> Thanks in advance,
>
> regards,
>
> Rob.
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users