[asterisk-users] Reliability of the newer IAXy's

[John Novack]

 Regarding the IAXy, newer model-  S101i
I have an application for one. Both the IAXy and the Asterisk would be 
behind routers ( cheap Linksys ones ) , both ends with a dynamic ( 
subject to change ) IP address.
I have RTFM, such as it is, and really don't see how it can be properly 
configured

Would I be better off with the 2100 and tough through the NAT issues?
Any suggestions??

John Novack

Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
> Honestly for the price its a bad unit. If they were priced $40-50 then
> yes its a great unit. But at $90, single port, no web config, very
> basic provisioning and with the S100 we had many issues of reliablity
> where a SIP ATA did not have the same issues. Maybe it's heat, but
> thats an issue I would expect from a $40 chinese ATA, not something
> that cost over $100 at the time.
>
> For $10 less you can find the SPA-2100 which has double the voice
> ports, a built in router and more options.
>
> On 9/15/06, Lists <Lists at ropeguru.com> wrote:
>> Is anyone out there currently using the newest model IAXy? I was 
>> thinking about purchasing one for testing but was wondering if they 
>> have gotten any better than the original models.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>>
>> asterisk-users mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>