[asterisk-users] More Zaptel build problems
Kristian Kielhofner
kris at krisk.org
Tue Sep 12 07:50:39 MST 2006
Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am trying to build zaptel 1.2.9 for AstLinux. I have already done
> an svn export of the 1.2.9 tag, so I am not experiencing the "missing
> octastic issue".
>
> However, I am having a funny problem. The zaptel.log that I have
> attached tells the full story, but I'll give you a synopsis...
>
> - Because I need to cross compile and the Zaptel Makefile does not
> really have a concept of CC/HOSTCC, I have to build the "makefw
> gendigits tor2fw.h radfw.h" targets with my HOSTCC - gcc. I then build
> the rest of zaptel using the "normal" uclibc cross compiler. This has
> always worked until now.
>
> - AstLinux doesn't have hotplug, so I have to define
> HOTPLUG_FIRMWARE=no. This means that vpm450m.c has to include
> vpm450m_fw.h which, as shown in the compiler output attached, has some
> syntax errors:
>
> /home/kris/projects/astlinux-trunk/build_i586/zaptel-1.2.9/wct4xxp/vpm450m_fw.h:1:
> error: syntax error before '/' token
> In file included from
> /home/kris/projects/astlinux-trunk/build_i586/zaptel-1.2.9/wct4xxp/vpm450m.c:16:
>
> /home/kris/projects/astlinux-trunk/build_i586/zaptel-1.2.9/wct4xxp/vpm450m_fw.h:1:75:
> too many decimal points in number
> /home/kris/projects/astlinux-trunk/build_i586/zaptel-1.2.9/wct4xxp/vpm450m.c:
> In function `init_vpm450m':
> /home/kris/projects/astlinux-trunk/build_i586/zaptel-1.2.9/wct4xxp/vpm450m.c:405:
> error: `vpm450m_fw' undeclared (first use in this function)
> /home/kris/projects/astlinux-trunk/build_i586/zaptel-1.2.9/wct4xxp/vpm450m.c:405:
> error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> /home/kris/projects/astlinux-trunk/build_i586/zaptel-1.2.9/wct4xxp/vpm450m.c:405:
> error: for each function it appears in.)
>
>
> My guess is that my hack of building makefw and friends might not
> work anymore... Or maybe this is some kind of strange bug. Any ideas?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Kristian Kielhofner
>
Kristian (replying to my own post),
It seems that this error was from fw2h.c putting the full pathname in
the generated vpm450m_fw.h. Although I just spent 20 minutes making my
own patch, it seems that it was fixed a while ago in r1458. Woo hoo
zaptel 1.2.9.1!
--
Kristian Kielhofner
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list