[asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

Mon Sep 4 22:37:56 MST 2006

Ronald,

	If I understand well, the second phones have a building digit map.
It has nothing to do with Asterisk! Asterisk only executes what it receives
from the phone.

	## In your scenario is the Asterisk built-in transfer function? The
ways your phone sends the DTMF depend on what you have configured in you
SIP.conf.

	http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+sip+dtmfmode

 David
-----Message d'origine-----
De : asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] De la part de Ronald
Wiplinger
Envoyé : 4 septembre 2006 20:06
À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

David Gagnon wrote:
> Ronald,
>
> 	Like someone already told you, you should explain more clearly the
> way you try to transfer, we need more details on the procedure, using
which
> button on which phone. We need every detail to help you. This as nothing
to
> do with the way the dial plan is loaded, this is totally false.
>
> 	I'm sure most of the people here don't understand how you try to
> transfer.
>
> 	David
>
>   

David,

I am not sure how the explanation how to punch the keys changes 
something, .... ;-.)

Ok, here we go:

Snom:
pick up the phone and hit ##6014 followed by [ok]

Noname:
pick up the phone and hit ##6014     must be pushed very fast!!! No end 
# needed, since the phone 601 starts to ring as soon I reach 1.

In my opinion Asterisk remembers all numbers and therefore it does not 
wait for the 4, since it found a match. This is in VoIP (in my opinion) 
wrong, since overlapping numbers are allowed.

Sip message / dtmf, this is something different! How is the transfer 
made? Maybe snom does send a sip message, while the noname only send 
dtmf tones.

bye

Ronald

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] De la part de Ronald
> Wiplinger
> Envoyé : 4 septembre 2006 09:22
> À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
>
> Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:
>   
>> On Sunday, September 03, 2006 3:40 AM Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> try that way. However, I have doubts as well. If you are right, than
>>> why snom phone does not have this problem? Would not here also the
>>> first match count?   
>>>     
>>>       
>> Because the transfer button on the SNOM is using a totally different
>>     
> mechanism than sending # to Asterisk. On your snom configuration (like
ours)
> the phone does not start to create/send a SIP message until you hit "OK".
At
> that time the entire number is there and a complete SIP transfer is
created.
> Cool down a bit. The problem you are having is most probably just a
dialplan
> problem. It takes some time and experience to get those things right. No
> need to yell here...
>   
>>   
>>     
> What's happen to you guys? I am not yelling, just asking.
> It is sure not a dialplan question! If it would be a dialplan question, 
> than it would be for each dialing, but it isn't.
>
> You mentioned SIP message and that makes me wonder! Are we not using 
> here dtmf ?? that is in my opinion not a sip message, isn't it?
> If it is a sequence of "tones", than why is it different if it is in a 
> string (like snom) or another phone, with single tones?
> If we understand this part, than is the question, where can I turn on 
> the system to take a longer break between "tones" still as a string?
>
> Back to the dialplan:
> A Voip number can have different length of digits. Each number is seen 
> as a complete "picture", and so a three digit and a four digit number is 
> something different. While in the legacy telephony the digits are worked 
> down one by one and if there is no more use of the digits, they are just 
> garbage and will be not used. Unlike in VoIP, where you can have a three 
> digit number and if you dial four digit, than it is a WRONG number !!!! 
> I just verified that: I dialed from 601 to  61522, however, 61522 does 
> not exist, but 615 exists. Guess what? I get a busy tone! That should 
> proof my thoughts (and that without yelling, ... hehehehe)
>
> bye
>
> Ronald
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>
> ---
> avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.
> Virus Database (VPS): 0635-4, 2006/09/01
> Tested on: 2006/9/4 ¤U¤È 11:40:24
> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
>
>
>   

-- 
Ronald Wiplinger  (CEO of ELMIT)
http://www.elmit.com  http://voip.elmit.com  http://e-paper.elmit.com 
Tel. (M) +886.939.775.516  (O) +886.2.2835.7765 (ENUM)   or FWD 511208
- I'm a SpamCon Foundation Member, #694, Verify it at http://www.spamcon.org

PS: Spam prevention!
Our system is protected with a spam prevention program. 
If you send us an e-mail, our system will send you a confirmation message
back. Just reply to this confirmation message please. 
After receiving this confirmation message, our system will send the hold
message (one) and all future messages (after the received confirmation
message) to me without asking you again.

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users