No subject


Tue Sep 5 14:32:44 MST 2006


party from the outside hangs up.  The next thing that is said is as 
follows:
"libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_cancel to work".

Now I've taken a look on my system and I do in fact have the libgcc_s.so.1 
on  my system.  The location is as follows:
/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
It is part of the libgcc-3.2.2-5 package that I have installed on my 
system.  

I'm not a programmer, just a novice so I'm not quite sure how to run a 
backtrace or where the core file would be located. Thanks for your help so 
far.
AJ


On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:

> - What's the console output after the crash when starting asterisk with 
> -gvvvc?
> - After the crash, run a backtrace of the core file and send the output 
> here
> 
> ...perhaps this should be on the FAQ?
> ...and perhaps the FAQ should be linked to from asterisk.org?
> 
> roy
> 
> On Sunday, Nov 30, 2003, at 14:14 Europe/Oslo, 
> firedude at shorelinuxsolutions.com wrote:
> 
> > I deleted all the asterisk related directories and their subdirectories
> > from /usr/src/ and did a brand new check out of zaptel, zapata, libpri,
> > asterisk-addons and asterisk.
> > AJ
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> >
> >> On Saturday 29 November 2003 20:36, dpobanz at hastingsutilities.com 
> >> wrote:
> >>> Quoting firedude at shorelinuxsolutions.com:
> >>>> In the zaptel zapata and libpri directories I executed a make clean
> >>>> and did a cvs update and then ran make install.  In the asterisk
> >>>> directory I did a make clean, a cvs update and a make upgrade.  So
> >>>> I guess the answer to your question is yes I did take care of the
> >>>> other things as well.  At least as far as I can see and as far as I
> >>>> know.
> >>>> AJ
> >>>
> >>> I don't know if your situation is the same as mine but I have been
> >>> burned in the past by assuming that cvs update will provide all the
> >>> lastest files. It only updates files that have previously been
> >>> downloaded, soooooo, if you do not have a file that is now part of
> >>> zaptel for instance, you will still not have that file. Do a fresh
> >>> checkout to make sure you have all of the needed files. By the way,
> >>> zapata is no longer needed. It has been incorporated into one of the
> >>> others.
> >>
> >> Perhaps you mean subdirectories?  True, 'cvs update' will not 
> >> typically
> >> create new subdirectories, so you can do a 'cvs update -d' to have the
> >> update create new subdirectories, as 'cvs checkout' does, but 'cvs
> >> update' should create new files (in existing directories) just fine.
> >>
> >> -Tilghman
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list