[asterisk-users] Re: can't transcode ilbc
Martin Joseph
ast at stillnewt.org
Mon Oct 2 10:41:34 MST 2006
On 2006-10-02 04:02:56 -0700, "James Harper"
<james.harper at bendigoit.com.au> said:
> I'm getting messages like 'WARNING[10263]: chan_sip.c:2552 sip_write:
> Asked to transmit frame type 8, while native formats is 1024 (read/write
> = 1024/1024)', where 8 = alaw and 1024 = ilbc.
>
> If I do show translation I get this:
> *CLI> show translation
> Translation times between formats (in milliseconds)
> Source Format (Rows) Destination Format(Columns)
>
> g723 gsm ulaw alaw g726 adpcm slin lpc10 g729 speex
> ilbc
> g723 - - - - - - - - - -
> -
> gsm - - 7 7 14 7 6 19 - 93
> -
> ulaw - 17 - 1 9 2 1 14 - 88
> -
> alaw - 17 1 - 9 2 1 14 - 88
> -
> g726 - 23 8 8 - 8 7 20 - 94
> -
> adpcm - 17 2 2 9 - 1 14 - 88
> -
> slin - 16 1 1 8 1 - 13 - 87
> -
> lpc10 - 24 9 9 16 9 8 - - 95
> -
> g729 - - - - - - - - - -
> -
> speex - 27 12 12 19 12 11 24 - -
> -
> ilbc - - - - - - - - - -
> -
>
> which I think means that there is no translation/transcoding path
> between ilbc and anything else.
>
> Is there some configuration option I need to set somewhere to allow this
> transcoding to take place or is there something about the ilbc protocol
> which makes transcoding a bad idea?
>
> The call in question is:
>
> SJphoneA -> AsteriskA -> mynetfone -> AsteriskB -> SJphoneB
>
> SJphoneA and SJphoneB both have a clear path to each other (tunnel), but
> when AsteriskA calls mynetfone, it uses nat. I don't think nat is a
> problem in this case though.
>
> Any suggestions? I'm also seeing the same thing when I try to make a
> call like:
> SJphone -> Asterisk -> PBX (via mISDN)
>
> SJphone is talking ilbc to Asterisk, but obviously Asterisk talks alaw
> to the PBX, and Asterisk refuses to transcode.
That seems odd to me, since I didn't do anything special to my install
1.2.10 and ilbc can be translated for me? Sorry I have no ideas, but
wanted to let you know, that apparently it is just you.
If you are running 1.2.10 you should update, as there was a bug that
affected translations as I recall. Maybe that's the issue?
Good Luck,
Marty
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list