[asterisk-users] 200+ analog phones connected to FXS modules
Tzafrir Cohen
tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
Thu Nov 30 13:25:22 MST 2006
Hi
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:59:13PM -0500, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> On Thursday 30 November 2006 06:13, Zoa wrote:
> > You could go for 2 quad pri cards + channel banks or for TDMoE or usb
> > channel banks.
[ disclaimer: I work for the company that makes the USB channel bank
which was mentioned by Zoa ]
> > The last option would be the cheaper and more scalable one imho
>
> The scale here is already bordering on unrealistic. I wouldn't expect them to
> want to make this too much bigger.
>
> Scaling aside, 200+ ulaw channels (13Mb/sec not including overhead) over USB?
> You're joking, right? I know that USB 2.0 is rated at 480Mbps but has this
> actually been tested and verified? I would imagine USB 2.0 chipset variants
> and inconsistencies are even worse than that of PCI.
USB2 actually seems to be a well-established standard. It is used by
many devices. For instance, people with high-capacity USB storage
devices would be rather upset to find their chipset acting up.
And if one USB2 card is not enough, get a USB2 PCI adapter for 10$ from
your local hardware store.
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir at jabber.org
+972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list