[Asterisk-Users] Problems with TDM400P and FXO modules

[Bogdan Tocu]

Board 1 was _really_ board 1 for 2 years ... don't think they just swaped by
themselves.
Any way ... i replaced board 1 and 3 and now it's everyting back to
normal...
thx for the help...


On 5/9/06, Rich Adamson <radamson at routers.com> wrote:
>
> Bogdan Tocu wrote:
> > The outline is like this :
> > Board 1 channels 1-4 # channels 1-4
> > Port 1 unused
> > Port 2 unused
> > Port 3 - FXO module - not working
> > Port 4 - FXO module - working ok
> > Board 2 - 4 FXO modules - all working ok  # channels 5-8
> > Board 3 - 4 FXO modules - none works .... #channels 9-12
> >
> > Any ideeas?
>
> Which part of the previous post did you not understand?
>
> You wrote the entries in /etc/zaptel.conf "assuming" that what you are
> calling Board 1 really is Board 1, and its not. Its Board 3 using your
> numbering scheme.
>
> I don't know of any way to determine exactly how three identical boards
> are numbered, so you'll have to experiment to determine which board
> holds channels 1-4, which has channels 5-8, and which has channels 9-12.
>
> Its obvious from the error message that you posted that channel 9 and 10
> correspond to what you are calling Board 1 (since there are no modules
> in the first two positions of that board).
>
> So, change your /etc/zaptel.conf and zapata.conf to address the empty
> channel 9 and 10 slots.
>
> Once you get asterisk to run, then (and only then) you can place a call
> to each pstn line and see which Zap channel corresponds to which board
> by watching the CLI.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060510/287e2af5/attachment.htm