[Asterisk-Users] why a perfectly fine iax2 host becomes UNREA
CHABLE?
Eric "ManxPower" Wieling
eric at fnords.org
Thu May 4 17:16:11 MST 2006
Colin Anderson wrote:
>> That is not a good metric for call completion. Shitty quality will not be
>> counted in that metric...
>
> Ah, true dat. However, if quality was crappy believe me my users would let
> me know. They are salespeople and wholly intolerant of anything that keeps
> them from yipping on the phone. I also run exactly the same rig at my house
> backhauled to our main Asterisk box to force me to eat my own dog food, and
> Snom > SIP > * > IAX2 > * > PRI sounds perfect pretty much 100% of the time.
> The only time I get chop is when I use my cordless to the TDM400: Cordless >
> TDM400 > * > IAX2 > * > PRI. Salespeople keep asking for cordless phones,
> but I keep telling them forget it. Cordless to an FXS to IAX over the
> Internet is just begging for trouble.
Why not cordless to a channel bank to Asterisk?
Of course, you can only have so many cordless phones in one area.
--
Now accepting new clients in Birmingham, Atlanta, Huntsville,
Chattanooga, and Montgomery.
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list