[Asterisk-Users] OT call recording (was stop monitor on transfer)

[Bob McDowell]

I'd wager that would depended on whether you were in front of a state
judge or a federal one... 

In general, I think no.  I think the smaller the government body, the
more restrictive it can be.  Unless directly contradicted by a federal
law, anyway.


Bob McDowell

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Rich
Adamson
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 3:27 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT call recording (was stop monitor on
transfer)

Martin Joseph wrote:
> 
> On Mar 13, 2006, at 12:00 PM, Bob McDowell wrote:
> 
>>
>> It depends....
>>
>> http://www.callcorder.com/phone-recording-law-america.htm
>>
> Thanks for the info!
> 
> 12 states require, under most circumstances, the consent of all 
> parties to a conversation. Those jurisdictions are California, 
> Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, 
> Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington.
> 

Do Federal rules trump state rules?

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users