[Asterisk-Users] PRI Issue - Calls being rejected with unacceptable channel

Dinesh Nair dinesh at alphaque.com
Fri Jun 23 01:48:26 MST 2006


On 06/23/06 01:22 Andy Brezinsky said the following:
> < Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8)  len=47
> < Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 15996/0x3E7C) (Originator)
> < Message type: SETUP (5)

>  > Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8)  len=10
>  > Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 48764/0xBE7C) (Terminator)
>  > Message type: CALL PROCEEDING (2)

>  > Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8)  len=14
>  > Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 48764/0xBE7C) (Terminator)
>  > Message type: CONNECT (7)

i may be way offbase with this, but on our PRI calls, we usually have 
asterisk sending an ALERTING between the CALL PROCEEDING and CONNECT. this 
seems borne out by...


> < Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8)  len=9
> < Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 15996/0x3E7C) (Originator)
> < Message type: RELEASE (77)

> < Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8)  len=13
> < Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 15996/0x3E7C) (Originator)
> < Message type: STATUS (125)
> < [08 03 83 e5 07]
> < Cause (len= 5) [ Ext: 1  Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard (0) 0: 0   
> Location: Transit network (3)
> <                  Ext: 1  Cause: Message not compatible with call state 
> (101), class = Protocol Error (6) ]

..."Message not compatible with call state" STATUS returned by the other 
side. you may want to experiment with a Wait(2) before the Answer().

-- 
Regards,                           /\_/\   "All dogs go to heaven."
dinesh at alphaque.com                (0 0)   http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/
+==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+
| for a in past present future; do                                        |
|   for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do   |
|   echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b."  |
| done; done                                                              |
+=========================================================================+



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list