[Asterisk-Users] Re: Which phones are good, or at least acceptable, for home and office

[M.Hockings]

OK, but I felt that I had narrowed the field down a bit and was just 
looking for confirmation that there were no severe problems with the 
choices.

People like yourself obviously have some experience with the different 
phone models and that is what I was hoping to learn from.  Yes, I could 
go buying all sorts of phones to find ones that are acceptable but my 
life is not telephony, I just want it to work.

A Porche certainly does the job better than a Chevette but if the 
Chevette is adequate for the job why not use it. I think that the 
Polycom 601 is nice but I don't see that it provides anything that I 
need beyond what the 501 gives and is certainly overkill for the 
satellite phones.

Mike

Michael Graves wrote:
> I can't tell you how many times I've seen broad questions like this 
> posted to the list..
> 
> The wiki (www.voip-info.org) is your friend. Use it. There's a lot of 
> good advise there.
> 
> Google is also your friend. Use it, too. Most especially use it to 
> search the list archives. There was just a long thread about this a few 
> days ago.
> 
> Finally, you can do what I did...buy some phones, try them for a while 
> then resell the ones you don't like. Ebay is a great toolo for this. I 
> bought and sold eight different model of SIP phones before settling upon 
> what I use today. When you've gained enough experience to have some well 
> founded opinions add to the wiki.
> 
> Lastly, if you're going to buy serious desk phones try the Aastra 480i 
> CT and the Polycom IP600/601. Life's too short to use a cheap phone.
> 
> Michael
> 
> On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 20:35:02 -0400, M.Hockings wrote:
> 
>  >I am looking to replace all of the old "Bell" (POTS) phones in my home
>  >and office with IP phones. As you can imagine I don't have a huge
>  >budget to work with but I want phones that will provide acceptable voice
>  >quality and durability.
>  >
>  >There are basically three categories as I see it
>  >1. satellite phones (low cost, low function)
>  >2. primary domestic phone (good quality, POE capable, headset capable)
>  >3. primary office phone (good quality, headset, speaker phone)
>  >
>  >In most places the LAN wiring is already in place so the phone would
>  >need to be able to provide a LAN port for an existing computer. POE
>  >would be desirable in a couple of places due to limited power outlets.
>  >
>  >What I have considered is the Grandstream BudgeTone BT-102 or BT-200 for
>  >the satellite phones, a Grandstream GXP-2000 for the domestic phone as
>  >it has all the requirements and there is a POE device available for it.
>  >My alternative pick for this would be a Polycom 301. And for my office
>  >I was considering a Polycom 501.
>  >
>  >Are any of these choices known to be bad performers, hard to configure
>  >with Asterisk, etc. I have read that it is difficult or not possible to
>  >get the message waiting indicator to show for the BT-102. Is this a
>  >problem with the GXP-2000 or Polycom phones ?
>  >
>  >Also is it possible to use the Linksys POE injector/splitter to power a
>  >BT-102 ? Or are there other solutions for POE?
>  >
>  >Some Web references follow for the keen.
>  >
>  >Thanks for any thoughts or input on this.
>  >
>  >Mike
>  >
>  >Linksys POE Injector/Splitter
>  >_http://www.insight.ca/apps/productpresentation/index.php?format=print&product_id=LNKPPOE12_
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >BT-102
>  >_http://www.canadianvoipstore.com/product_info.php?cPath=95_105&products_id=40_
>  >
>  >GXP-2000
>  >_http://www.canadianvoipstore.com/product_info.php?cPath=95_106&products_id=331_
>  >
>  >Polycom 301
>  >_http://www.canadianvoipstore.com/product_info.php?products_id=757_
>  >
>  >Polycom 501
>  >_http://www.canadianvoipstore.com/product_info.php?products_id=758_
>  >
>  >_______________________________________________
>  >--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>  >
>  >Asterisk-Users mailing list
>  >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>  > _http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users_
>  >