[Asterisk-Users] Hard drive write cache
shadowym
shadowym at hotmail.com
Tue Jun 13 09:02:38 MST 2006
The cold hard truth is that if Asterisk cannot achieve 99.999% uptime
without becoming much more expensive that a traditional PBX then it is not a
viable alternative. Even elcheapo Key systems are rated for five nines.
That is what the telco world requires unless your just using Asterisk in
your basement as a hobby or as a one man company.
Redundant Servers is moving into the realm of non-competitive with
Traditional PBX IMHO.
I don't care about corruption of the CDR or any of the logging/database
information. All I care about is the ability make phone calls after power
failure. That IS the MAIN function of a PBX. Not call centers, databases,
CDR, click 2 call, and all the other bells and whistles.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boris Bakchiev [mailto:boris at jildent.com.au]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 2:13 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Hard drive write cache
>
> These days you don't have to worry much about your write
> cache unless you're running application where once single
> byte changed will affect whole file.
>
> Look at it this way, the only corruption will occur is
> whatever the files were open by asterisk at the time of the
> crash. And only up to the point where the file was last open.
> As far as I know asterisk does not keep cdr or log files open
> so you would loose only the data that was written at the time
> of the power failure.
>
> Any journaling file system (ext3, resierfs, xfs, etc) will
> easily handle any power failure event. Your files will not be
> corrupt but could miss some of the data.
>
> At the most you will loose 10-50 cdr entries written to you log files.
>
> If you post CDR to a remote SQL database then you asterisk
> install and linux is more or less static and will not be
> affected by the power failure.
>
> What you need to do is minimise the writes to hard disk's:
>
> 1 - Send syslog to remote server and do not do ANY syslogs
> Or keep the circular buffer in memory if you have plenty of it.
> 2 - Send CDR's to SQL server (or log to ramdisk and send to
> remote server every few minutes via SSH)
> 3 - Do not record any calls (or do that somewhere else)
> 4 - Stop any services that write/read data on regular intervals.
>
> If you have no writes you have nothing to worry about during
> power failure and journaling file system will take care of the rest.
>
> Keep your partition size really small so that fsck will not
> take much time.
>
> You have to be realistic, you cannot achieve 99.999% uptime.
> That's 5 minutes per year downtime.
> You will have more or less 100% until your first hardware failure.
>
> Even if you have all the hardware components pre-purchased it
> will still take you 2-12 hours to detect, diagnose and fix
> the fault if you lucky.
> So your 5 minuets
>
> If the business is demanding 99.999% then it should be
> prepared to invest into the hardware.
> I would recommend a cluster or even better a fault tolerant server.
> Those are expensive but you can pretty much rule out the
> hardware failure and swap all of the failed components while
> the system is running (cpu, memory, hdd, etc).
>
> Look at Stratus or NEC FT servers if you need hardware redundancy.
> They're expensive but will give you the hardware reliability you need.
>
> Or get a traditional PABX :)
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-
> > bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of shadowym
> > Sent: Tuesday, 13 June 2006 10:34
> > To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Hard drive write cache
> >
> >
> > I am looking at ways to harden my asterisk install to
> prevent computer
> > related issues from happening. I am concerned about about
> disk write
> > cache.
> > That seems to be a major source of hard drive corruption on power
> failure.
> > Hard Drive corruption is simply unacceptable for the 99.999% uptime
> > requirements of my Asterisk install that needs to be as
> reliable as a
> > proprietary PBX.
> >
> > Of course I will be using redundant power supplies, raid 1 and use a
> UPS.
> > None of those things mean much if the power cords accidentally get
> pulled
> > from the back of the server. Unlikely as it may be I have
> to consider
> ALL
> > possibilities.
> >
> > So is disabling the write cache a good way to reduce the
> risk of hard
> > drive corruption for an Asterisk server? I am not too
> concerned about
> > the reduced performance/lifetime of hardrives with write cache
> > disabled since
> Asterisk
> > is not a very write intensive environment. Even with lot's of
> voicemail
> > going on.
> >
> > Any other recommendations/links for increasing the reliability of
> Asterisk
> > servers?
> > _______________________________________________
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> >
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list