[asterisk-users] Load balenced (ADSL) network connections,
is it possible?
jacobso1
jacobso1 at scarlet.be
Thu Jul 20 10:06:15 MST 2006
Unless my brain did melt down under the high heat here, there are a few
things I would share :
- 1 channel u-law uses at least 80k because of encapsulation
So, think about compression
- You can never use 100% of a bandwidth. (80% is a good max)
- The values given are maximum values, far from the guaranteed
values
-
Instead of adsl, I would go for sdsl (symmetrical)
Where adsl is possible, sdsl is normally also possible
Sdsl is more expensive but you can demand sla, higher guaranteed bandwidth
(up to 50 or 100%)
Never forget that the guaranteed bandwidth is between your router and the
first equipment of your provider.
You get NO warranty you have that bandwidth further away even on your isp
backbone.
Isp sales men always forget to talk about that
If they say you get 100% to use all the time, sign immediately IF they put
that WRITTEN alongside financial compensation if they fail.
Dear mister sales man, you do not have to worry about compensation since you
guaranteed it would not happen ;-)
Other problems you will face with several IP’s :
Even if you can manage several IP’s for the outgoing traffic, you cannot for
incoming traffic as those are unaware of your situation
Or they need to put multiple entries for you asterisk and try those
sequentially
Or you could go up for incoming calls and down for outgoing calls
That is a simple solution, that will statistically work but NO warranty
NOT really a telco way
Routing problems might occur
…
Regards,
T. Jacobson
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.2/393 - Release Date: 19/07/2006
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.2/393 - Release Date: 19/07/2006
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060720/b7e41e15/attachment.htm
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list