[asterisk-users] DUNDI / regcontext

[Simon Woodhead]

Thanks for the reply Brad.

The relevant section of sip.conf was posted:

[general]
regcontext=sipregistration

If you mean extensions.conf, I wasn't creating the extension in there other
than for testing. RegContext correctly creates the context on registration
but does not create the extension. If I create the extension manually, the
DUNDi lookup works just fine.

Simon

On 7/16/06, Watkins, Bradley <Bradley.Watkins at compuware.com> wrote:
>
> Could you possibly put up the relevant section(s) of your sip.conf?  It
> sounds like the DUNDi portion is set up properly, and obviously it's not
> going to find an extension that doesn't exist.
>
> Regards,
> - Brad
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com on behalf of Simon Woodhead
> Sent: Sat 7/15/2006 5:59 PM
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Subject: [asterisk-users] DUNDI / regcontext
>
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I've been having a go at getting DUNDI working this evening to enable
> users to register to any Asterisk box and to look them up from another.
> The DUNDI part works just great (very impressed), as does the subsequent
> joining of calls between the two servers but I'm struggling with
> regcontext and would be grateful for any input.
>
> sip.conf includes:
>
> [general]
> regcontext=sipregistration
>
> When a user registers, I get the "Added extension 'XXXXXX' priority 1 to
> sipregistration" message. However, 'show dialplan' does not show the
> extension and a DUNDI lookup does not return it. The sipregistration
> context has been auto-created but is empty. If I manually create the
> sipregistration context and add the NoOp extension, then everything
> works as expected.
>
> I've tried this across multiple boxes, each running different versions
> right up to the latest stable but the behaviour is the same. It is also
> the same with both SIP and IAX registrations and doesn't make a
> difference if the peer is defined in the .conf file or Realtime. They do
> all have identical configurations though so I suspect there might be
> something in our setup which is conflicting.
>
> Any input gratefully received.
>
> All the best,
> Simon
>
>
> The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It
> contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named
> addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose
> it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately
> and then destroy it.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060717/9cb8b59d/attachment.htm