[asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!

[trixter aka Bret McDanel]

On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 23:57 -0700, Martin Joseph wrote:
> I think if you keep the older source in a separate directory,  you can
> always cd back to it and do a make clean, make, make install.
> 
or if you are lazy, make takes multiple targets so you could do:
make clean all install
all on one like that way and if one target fails the others shouldnt
proceed :)  'install' should have a dependancy on 'all' so if you just
do make clean install it should work the same.

It will use the newer zaptel if you dont do that as well, so if zaptel
is the issue that causes you to want to go back then you will have to do
a make clean all install there as well.


> This is also the reason I have avoided building from SVN, as I like
> the idea of being able to revert to an earlier working build if need
> be...

you can have different SVN repositories on your local system as well,
and still do that, or use a release tag to get a specific version,
either way.


-- 
Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com     Bret McDanel
Belfast IE +44 28 9099 6461    DE +49 801 777 555 3402
Utrecht NL +31 306 553058      US WA +1 360 207 0479
US NY +1 516 687 5200          FreeWorldDialup: 635378
http://www.trxtel.com the VoIP provider that pays you!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060717/2958312a/attachment.pgp