[asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards

[C F]

Thanks for that Tzafrir. Why does it ignore the secend CPU?

BTW, on a side note on this topic, how can one calculate simultaneous
transcoded channels using show transalation?

In the case where it tells me 17 ms for encoding and 4 for decoding,
that gives me 21ms per channel, in what time frame can I squeeze in
how many channels before the calls start becoming  intolerable? In
other words should I aim for a 200ms time frame which means that I
will get around 10 channels? or can I aim for a full second? which
will give me around 50 channels?

Thank You

On 7/9/06, Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 05:07:16AM -0400, C F wrote:
> > Tzafrir, are you trying to tell me that I can realy do double on the
> > intel becuase the second CPU will do it?
>
> In the ideal case you'll get double performance with two CPUs. In
> theory.
>
> A case of many concurrent calls is basically something that can be
> easily parallelized. So in theory nothing stops you from getting
> something closer to double performance. I don't know how close reality
> is to that nice theory.
>
> I only remarked that 'show translations' totally ignores the second CPU.
>
> --
> Tzafrir Cohen      sip:tzafrir at local.xorcom.com
> icq#16849755       iax:tzafrir at local.xorcom.com
> +972-50-7952406
> tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com  http://www.xorcom.com
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>