[Asterisk-Users] S100U and TigerJet

[Tzafrir Cohen]

On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 03:12:17PM +0100, asterisk at frameweb.it wrote:
> Hi all, this is another post about this problem.
> I installed from scratch a new Suse Linux  10.0, with latest stable
> asterisk.
> Moreover I add the lines to  /etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules, in order to
> let the driver create the /dev/zap.......
> 
> When I plug into usb port my TigerJet adapter, I see on /var/log/messages
> 
> Feb 24 14:55:02 srvlnx05 kernel: usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using
> uhci_hcd and address 2
> Feb 24 14:55:03 srvlnx05 kernel: usbcore: registered new driver
> snd-usb-audio
> Feb 24 14:55:03 srvlnx05 kernel: zaptel: module not supported by Novell,
> setting U taint flag.
> Feb 24 14:55:03 srvlnx05 kernel: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on
> major 196
> Feb 24 14:55:03 srvlnx05 kernel: wcusb: module not supported by Novell,
> setting U taint flag.
> Feb 24 14:55:03 srvlnx05 kernel: usbcore: registered new driver wcusb
> Feb 24 14:55:03 srvlnx05 kernel: Wildcard USB FXS Interface driver
> registered

That is a generic message the wcusb prints when it loads, even without a
valid device. Any specific message about registering a span or so?
Do you see it under /proc/zap at that point?

cat /proc/zap/*

If not, there is no poit of tweaking udev, as it simply did not get the
inputs to work with.

> 
> while lsusb shows
> Bus 001 Device 002: ID 06e6:831c Tiger Jet Network, Inc.
> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 0000:0000
> 
> under /dev, I see "borning" /zap and children
> srvlnx05:/etc # dir /dev/zap/
> 
> drwxr-xr-x   2 root     root          120 Feb 24 14:55 .
> drwxr-xr-x  14 root     root        15720 Feb 24 14:55 ..
> crw-rw----   1 asterisk asterisk 196, 254 Feb 24 14:55 channel
> crw-rw----   1 asterisk asterisk 196,   0 Feb 24 14:55 ctl
> crw-rw----   1 asterisk asterisk 196, 255 Feb 24 14:55 pseudo
> crw-rw----   1 asterisk asterisk 196, 253 Feb 24 14:55 timer
> 
> but NO channel 01 al all.
> I would like to know if anybody
> 1) ever succeded in having this configuration up and running.
> 2) ever succeded in having this configuration up and running with a *TRUE*
> S100U adapter from Digium.
> 3) If 2 is true *WHERE* it could be possible to buy this true adapter: on
> digium shop I was not able to find it.
> 
> My opinion is that it could be an issue related to the operating system: I
> think I should do something similar to what I did on
>  /etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules in order to allow the creation of
> usb-related devices under /dev/zap. Unfortunately
> I don't know anything about Linux kernel enumeration process. Also, does
> exist any debugging tool for wcusb ?
> Wcusb is up and running, is the only in the system ( I removed the wcusb.ko
> natively present under the /extra directory)
> lsmod | grep wcu shows:
> 
> srvlnx05:~ # lsmod | grep wcu
> wcusb                  19104  0
> zaptel                187268  1 wcusb
> usbcore               112512  5 wcusb,snd_usb_audio,snd_usb_lib,uhci_hcd

wcusb has no problem of loading without a device connected.

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen         | tzafrir at jbr.cohens.org.il | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il |                           | a Mutt's  
tzafrir at cohens.org.il |                           |  best
ICQ# 16849755         |                           | friend