[asterisk-users] Linux distro + Asterisk or Trixbox?

[Andrew Joakimsen]

I've used Asterisk on a bunch of RH 7.3 machines which were then replaced by
RHEL 4. It is very stable, my biggest compliant is that RHEL(or CentOS,
which is a direct rip-off) uses outdated packages (Linux 2.4.x, Apache 1,
Mysql 4, php 4, etc) and Linux 2.4.x requires certain USB hardware to use
zaptel timing without a hardware card, so we have a bunch of these dual xeon
machines with the wrong USB hardware and can only run MeetMe on the one with
the t1 cards.

So we're moving everything over to SuSE Linux, has more up-to-date packages,
still very stable and generally runs asterisk very well.

On 12/16/06, Phil Finkler <PhilF at iqconsultinginc.com> wrote:
>
>  Hey all,
>
>
>
> I've been doing a lot of playing, and a lot of reading, and it seems
> people are split as to whereas if they're running their favorite Linux
> distro and asterisk or Trixbox.  I'm getting closer to really looking at a
> production environment and I'm just looking for any opinions.  I'm really
> enjoying learning linux and asterisk, so initial "ease of use" isn't really
> a huge benefit to me.  In the end stability and upgradeability will be my
> main concerns.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061217/755951e4/attachment.htm