[asterisk-users] IAX2 to SIP protocol translation overhead?

Vicky vicky.r at gmail.com
Tue Dec 12 06:03:21 MST 2006


One main disadvantage would be the media stream will pass through asterisk (
no reinvites like sip->sip ) but its not a problem if client pc'a and your
asterisk server are on same network .Sip->iax conversion takes  less cpu but
it will be more if codec transcoding is involved .

On 12/12/06, David Thomas <punknow at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Just wondering if there is much CPU overhead in the translation from
> IAX2 to SIP, and how taxing this function is as compared to
> transcoding.
>
> We're trying to build an efficient system and would like to avoid
> taxing the CPU as much as possible. Our upstream service provider is
> 100% SIP, however we'd like to use IAX2 in our network as well, if it
> does not cause too much overhead.
>
> Not sure if it matters, but we will be running aprox 100 simultaneous
> calls.
>
> Thanks,
> David
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061212/c51f2341/attachment.htm


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list