[asterisk-users] NAT and Dial to two channels at once

[Andrew Joakimsen]

You need to understand how NAT works, if you can chan2 and chan2 is behind a
NAT and suddenly someone else is invited to chan2's IP address port 5060
chan2's router willl say "WTF I dont have an estabished connection on port
5060" (to the client being reinvited to chan2) and it wont work. You need to
have the media path go through asterisk in that case.

On 12/10/06, Brad Templeton <brad+aster at templetons.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 01:39:10PM -0500, Eric Jacksch wrote:
> > Someone may have a more elegant solution, but I have found that allowing
> > reinvite on a phone connected via NAT gateway causes too many problems,
> > especially with the difference in the various NAT implementations.  I
> > set canreinvite=no host=dynamic nat=yes qualify=yes for all phones that
> > connect from the Internet.
> >
> > A note to anyone doing Internet telephony -- the latest Linksys routers
> > seem to ignore the small UDP keepalive that some phones like the
> > grandstreams send, so the NAT hole closes.  I've had to start using
> > qualify=yes to get asterisk to keep the NAT hole open.
> >
>
> Actually, that part is working, and in any event I can hand-open holes
> in the NAT in cases where it doesn't work.
>
> As long as the incoming call is redirected to a single channel, it
> works fine.   Setting canreinvite=no and nat=yes and the rest don't
> help the problem we get when the incoming call is sent to a
> Dial(chan1&chan2).
>
> I don't want to turn reinvite off, it's a very important feature.
> I'm giving IP phones to all members of the family this christmas,
> and most of them live 2500 miles away.   Nobody will want to have
> their audio hairpin through my server.   That would just add lots of
> latency -- indeed enough to make the calls much less pleasant -- as
> well as eat my own bandwidth and add risk of packet loss for no
> reason.
>
> As noted, it all works with just one channel, but for many of them,
> to get them introduced to voip, it would be nice if I could have their
> DID ring both their new SIP phone and their old PSTN phone (and
> possibly their cell phone at the same time, though the voice-mail
> problem remains a curse if you do that until I can convince Mark to
> put in my fix for that.)
>
>
> Ringing both the pstn phone and the IP phone is not just for
> newcomers, however.  If you only have one IP phone in the house,
> and you are not near it, you may not hear it and you don't want to
> have to run elsewhere to get it.  (Could do call pickup over
> PSTN.)
>
> I understand if you Dial(chan1&chan2) you need to do independent
> invites with their own SDPs, because the two channels can be in
> different places, with different codecs.  You don't know until
> one answers what you will finally do, though if the one that answers
> can be native bridged, it should be native bridged.
>
> However, the current situation -- no audio at all until a reinvite
> is triggered by putting the call on hold -- is obviously not very
> exciting.
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061211/78549bf0/attachment.htm