[asterisk-users] Manager Interface API's (OSS doc discussion)
John Novack
jnovack at stromberg-carlson.org
Wed Aug 16 18:34:41 MST 2006
Michael Collins wrote:
> I guess I simply have a different viewpoint. If I document, even
> lightly, something that I give to the general public (or a specific
> group within that general public), I feel I *WILL* get a ROI. The more
> people who use my 'gift' the better. Who knows if someone will return
> to me a snippet of code that makes my script/program even better?
>
> The other thing is this: I looked at the Perl module Doug referenced.
> It was uploaded to the CPAN, which means that it was meant to be shared
> with the general public. The documentation on this module is skeletal,
> and that is a generous description. (I also pored over the source and
> found next to nothing in the way of documentation.) Fortunately the CPAN
> allows authors to accept annotations - the annotated CPAN - which means
> that a generous soul who has "figured it out" can post his knowledge for
> everyone's benefit.
>
> As for the Python modules, I confess that I know nothing about them or
> Python.
>
> Bottom line: Free code w/o documentation should be disclaimed as such.
> On the other hand, documentation is NEVER a bad thing. Ever. OSS
> thrives when we share, not just code, but knowledge and ideas.
>
> -MC
>
Sir, you are a breath of fresh air. I can only hope your outlook and
attitude are contagious in this community and the programming community
in general
John Novack
>> If I just made something that I needed...and then decided to release
>>
> it to
>
>> the public incase anyone else needed it...I wouldn't waste my time
>> documenting it...because there is no ROI to me for that....
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list