[Asterisk-Users] SPA-3000 Bug? Dropped calls while registering.
Moises Silva
moises.silva at gmail.com
Thu Apr 20 06:34:47 MST 2006
i just got a SPA3000 but still not using it on production, and i
havent tested deeply. However, have you tried using "incominglimit=1"
in the register context of the SPA?? i guess that would limit in the
PBX rather that sending the call to the SPA.
Regards
On 4/20/06, Dana Harding <dharding at nucleus.com> wrote:
>
> Hello All!
>
> I am in the process of assembling an asterisk-based phone system for my
> office - using SPA-3000s to connect the network to the PSTN. I am
> wondering if anybody else can get (or has already seen) the same behaviour
> out of their 3000.
>
> The short version: Send multiple Calls to the SPA's FXO port at the same
> time it is re-registering with Asterisk.
> SPA HTTP Configuration: PSTN Line -> Register Expires: 5
> (to ensure it is registering all the time)
> Dial one number through the SPA's FXO port - establish a conversation
> Dial another number through the same FXO port (SPA3000/NXXXXXY).
>
> What SHOULD happen is the second caller receives a '504 - Service
> Unavailable' error while the first caller happily continues the established
> conversation. What happens here: the already established call gets
> dropped, AND the second caller gets a 504 error.
>
> I did send a note to Linksys - and will see what kind of reponse they have.
>
> With longer "Register Expires:" times (10, 30, 60 seconds) it took more
> attempts to make the call drop.
> I have my Register Expires time cranked up to 86400 (1 day) now - and am
> hoping I don't see another repeat.
>
> -------------------
> There are three SPA-3000s in the system. I looked at some more
> complicated dialplan layouts, and decided to keep it simple:
>
> exten => s,1,Dial(${PSTN2}/${ARG1},,n)
> exten => s,2,Dial(${PSTN3}/${ARG1},,n)
> exten => s,3,Dial(${PSTN1}/${ARG1},,n)
> exten => s,4,Wait(1)
> exten => s,5,Playback(all-circuits-busy-now)
> exten => s,6,Congestion()
>
> PSTN1,2,3 are 3 SPA-3000s registered with Asterisk.
> This approach relies on the SPA denying a call if it is already in use.
>
>
> Looking through the logs, the SIP packets seem to be in order. INVITE,
> 100-Trying, 504-Service Unavailable, ACK.
>
> I'm at the end of my technical limit (ever increasing as I play in the
> open-source world) - but my best guess is:
> During the Register process, something is temporarily reset (such as a
> variable indicating that the line is in use) such that when the second call
> comes in - it is actually connected to the existing conversation for a brief
> period before the SPA realizes that the line is actually already in use.
> As part of a cleanup procedure - a hangup procedure is run: disconnecting
> the call.
>
> The Equipment my trials were done on:
> SPA3000 Hardware Version: 2.0.1(7376), Software Version: 3.1.10(GWd),
> and also tried Software 3.1.7.
> Nothing plugged into the FXS port.
> Asterisk 1.2.4 running on FreeBSD 5.4 (i386), AMD Athlon 64 3200+, 1GB RAM.
> SNOM 320. Application-Version: snom320-SIP 5.3.6 Rootfs: snom320 jffs2
> v3.36
> Polycom IP501 <don't have access to the software/hardware version from
> where I am right now>
> Cellphone
>
> All SIP equipment is running on a dedicated LAN. Network "splitters" were
> used to run two parallel LANs through the existing cabling. (cat5e has 4
> twisted pairs, only 2 twisted pairs are needed for a 100BASET connection)
> The only computers on the LAN are the asterisk box, and my workstation (2
> NICs each).
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Dana Harding
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>
--
"Su nombre es GNU/Linux, no solamente Linux, mas info en http://www.gnu.org"
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list