[Asterisk-Users] STUN vs NAT Helper

[chentschel at arnet.com.ar]

If you have a linux box, then u can try sip-nat-helper for netfilter. 
Cheers.


Mensaje citado por: Waldo Rubinstein <waldo at trianet.net>:

> I\'m wondering if anyone can recommend one over the other. I\'m mostly
> interested in running open source solutions, so I would prefer if
> your recommendations are within the open source arena.
>
> Basically, I contemplated the idea of using SER as a NAT Helper and
> possibly as a SIP server for a portion of our user base. We prefer to
> have Asterisk in the mix because of the additional wealth of features
> it can add to the SIP services (e.g. voicemail, ivr, call queueing,
> etc).
>
> All of our clients are behind NATs, mainly basic NATs such as linksys
> routers behind DSL modems.
>
> I read on the wiki that STUN is not readily supported by most
> clients, so I don\'t know if its worth the effort or if we should just
> concentrate on getting SER working with Asterisk.
>
> Any ideas or suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
> Waldo
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 

__________________________________
Registrate desde http://servicios.arnet.com.ar/registracion/registracion.asp?origenid=9 y participá de todos los beneficios del Portal Arnet.