[Asterisk-Users] civil emergency comms: Asterisk + HAM

Sun Sep 11 21:15:28 MST 2005

Try contacting the repeater trustee for
http://www.wa3key.com/blura.html.  They have a picture of one on their
site with it lit up.
You will need to recrystal the radio to a proper TX/RX pair for 70cm.
However, depending on your area, you should contact your local repeater
coordnator so you don't step on anyone's toes (especially the case in
So.Cal ;)

Looks like you can order crystals from:
http://www.icmfg.com/motorola.html.

And there are plenty of links associated with this hardware.  Google is
your friend.

As for interfacing it to *, you'll need a phone patch adapter.  You
could purchase one or build one but you'll need to get more information
on how to do such.
Once you have the repeater up and running, you also need to setup * to
see the phone patch/radio interface as a radio.  This may require a
controller card.  (see the voip-info.org wiki)  And... if you're going
to go that far, consider enrolling into the echoirlp project.  It's a
VoIP oriented repeater link system that uses the internet as it's
conduit.  By Part 97 rule, the system must be protected from unlicensed
use so interfacing with asterisk would require password protection and
you as the repeater owner would be liable for any misuse of the system.

73 de Don 

________________________________

From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve
Totaro
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 6:07 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] civil emergency comms: Asterisk + HAM

Just a shot in the dark here. 

I bought this unit
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5792377951&rd=1&sspag
ename=STRK%3AMEWN%3AIT&rd=1 a couple months ago hoping to connect it to
an * system for experimentation.  I am a HAM n00b.  I can found no
documentation on this unit anywhere.  Does anyone know where to start?

I joined a local HAM club but have not had any time to go and pick
brains.  I am afraid to really even plug it in until I know what I am
doing and have a call sign and everything so the FCC does't kick in my
door.  I did plug it in for a minute and there were no lights or
anything so I not even sure it works.

Anyone have any links or ideas?

Thanks,
Steve

	----- Original Message ----- 
	From: Don Fanning <mailto:don at 00100100.net>  
	To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
<mailto:asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>  
	Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 1:37 PM
	Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] civil emergency comms: Asterisk +
HAM

	Time and time again, emergency action drills take place in
cities to target where their weaknesses are in "crisis" handling.
Usually they involve planes crashing or explosions (mock of course).
Obviously they were never prepared for this sort of disaster in their
recovery plan.  I've participated in a few ARES/RACES drills and have to
say that much could be done to improve upon the "HAM" infrastructure.

	Most of the time, communications is coordinated through 1
repeater system.  When this repeater goes down, of course people would
switch comms to another but in a case like this, where all the repeater
systems go down except for maybe one, there needs to be a better plan.

	In Amateur Satellite Service, these orbiting "Repeaters" employ
a system called RUDAK where a chunk of spectrum is repeated.  Obviously
this isn't feasible in terrestrial repeaters but they do have the
ability to turn off radios and switch bands at will depending on
operating conditions.  With software controlled radio and Asterisk, the
repeater system could be made to be more resilient to disaster by
linking to other repeater systems via radio where it could connect
outward.  

	If you figure the overhead of a repeater's transmitter and
receiver plus the controller, replaceing the controller with an asterisk
based unit (integration) would make more sense as it would give the
repeater system much more capabilities in the same footprint and power.
Additionally, these repeater systems are located on hilltops with other
radio systems so they should have emergency power available (if you've
ever been to a hilltop repeater site, you'll know what I mean).  

	I think the biggest thing that hurts ham radio's ability to
react to a crisis is the lack of equipment and operators.  Most of the
traffic we pass is "Health and Welfare" with "Logistics" being the
second to it.  What defeats this is that in a disaster where local/high
band long haul capabilities are diminished, is simply the one repeater
that is functional because everything is squeezed onto one VHF/UHF
repeater.

	Where I could see thing being improved?  Installation of
802.11b/g WLAN under Part 97.  It would allow for more users into the
system, there are less hardware and power components and allows the
system to be dynamically configured.  Asterisk could play a huge role
then as it's made for IP based traffic and could re-route in a split
second.

	-Don

________________________________

	From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Michael D
Schelin
	Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 10:20 PM
	To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
	Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] civil emergency comms: Asterisk +
HAM

	The two best forms of communications in a real disaster and one
always has been is #1 Ham radio. and #2 satellite telephone. Ham radio
is global and has proven time and time again to be the most reliable
when the infrastructer has been damaged.  The U.S government is the
biggest user of satellite telephones which is also becoming a valuable
tool again when the communications infrastructure is down.  It would be
nice If Asterisk could be used but in this case but it's useless.
People are displaced and most of the communications infrastructure for
the city is unusable.  I don't mean all of the telco's systems. It's the
flood that wiped out  most home and business systems.  For us, The best
thing that a provider can do is to have redundant servers in different
cities.  This should remind us all how fragile our lives are.  

	Chris Travers wrote:

		Mark Phillips wrote: 

			Hold on here folks, 

			I'm guessing that the original poster of this
thread isn't a member of his local RAyNet team. 

			Whilst I don't profess to be an expert at this I
have been doing emergency radio for quite some time and have seen
service at the Lockerbie bombing, Docklands bomb, Ground Zero (I'm sure
I'm a terrorist target y'know - they seem to follow me everywhere) and
soon I'll be in Louisiana. 

			In all of these events the KISS principle must
and does prevail. We need a system that is a simple and energy efficient
as possible. 

			Building a network of * servers and Wi-Fi links
is all very well but how are you going to power them? 

		These are excellent points.  I have a few interesting
suggestions here....  The first is that the only obstacle to any sort of
longer-range point to point line is merely power.  This is true whether
you are talking HAM or fiberoptics.  Note that if you have the power, it
would take disruption of the physical line to disrupt a fiber line.
Note that DirectNIC in New Orleans remained operational without *any*
downtime or loss of connectivity with the rest of the world. 

		The suggestion that I have is for various areas to have
dedicated civil emergency com units with strategic reserves of fuel (3-4
weeks worth), battery backups, etc.  These units would have links
(fiber, microwave, and/or satellite, better to pick 2 of 3) to areas
outside expected disaster zones.  Asterisk could then run across these
links.  (Sattelite links would best be POTS-type). 

		The point is to a disaster-tolerant communications
infrastructure which could then be used to to provide additional
communications services to the relief workers.  With various point to
point wireless capabilities, it might be possible to use them to provide
cell service to relief workers etc through the installation of GSM
microcells (which could be brought in after the fact). 

		See where I am going? 

			Generators require fuel which is always in short
supply and batteries die out quickly. Adding Ham Radio to the picture
doesn't really add much when you are trying to do something like a *
network. The radio gear just isn't designed to integrate with the *
server. 

			Ham radio is being used down in the Katrina
affected area with great results for both emergency and heath/welfare
related traffic. They are using both "phone" (that's when one talks in
to the radio) and data modes and can be heard all over the 75 and 40
meter bands here in the US. 

			Power for most of these stations comes from
batteries they loot (with Police approval) from abandoned cars or a
combo of solar and batteries. Many stations are only hear on the air
after dark so that they can put as much sunlight into their batteries as
possible. 

			Yes, electricity is available in some places
either all day or across the peak hours (allowing the workmen to restore
power to other areas). 

			Yes, there are radio to phone interconnects but
these really are a single phone to a single radio. Think of it as a
cordless phone in that the radio user can be anywhere within reach of
the base station. 

			Such technologies, whilst legal here in the US,
may not be legal elsewhere. When last at home (UK) I was not able to
connect my radio to the phone system by law (this may have changed
recently - not been home for 8 years). Many countries have such
restrictions and as we saw during the Tsunami, rules don't get relaxed
just because there's a panic on. 

			Without question a phone system would be much
better than a radio station. As such I'll be taking a portable * server
I've built, all the IP hard phones I can find and 5 DirectTV style
Internet systems. 

		How do IP hardphones work with satellite internet?  I
always thought people had real trouble getting them to work at all..... 

		Best Wishes, 
		Chris Travers 
		Metatron Tecnology Consulting 

________________________________

		_______________________________________________
		--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

		Asterisk-Users mailing list
		Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
		http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
		To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

________________________________

	_______________________________________________
	--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

	Asterisk-Users mailing list
	Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
	http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
	To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
	   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050911/3cae4f9c/attachment.htm