[Asterisk-Users] oh323 or h323

[Leandro Tenorio]

    I'm using oh323 too without any issues, but in Steve specific
configuration, depends on how his provider expect to be register as
(Terminal or Gw) afaik, oh323 just could be binded as gateway, so better ask
the provider.
 
LTenorio

  _____  

From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Mehdi chouikh
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 12:11 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] oh323 or h323


Hello 
Personaly i prefer oh323, i am using for one year whitout problems.
and is more easier to configure.
 
regards

 
On 9/1/05, Steve Ducat <steveducat at gmail.com> wrote: 

I have just signed up for 2 landline numbers in China. They have
offered to sell me 2 h323 compatible handsets which I have declined as 
I want these numbers to ring into my * box.

They have given me the following info (modified for security)..

Protocol = H323

Gatekeeper = 210.21.118.xxx

H323ID = .HMA0200.10szxn-hxxx
e164 = 02022xx2912 

H323ID = .HMA0200.10szxn-kxxx
e164 = 02022xx2913

Really what I want is for * to act as the endpoint.

So the big question, do I use oh323 or h323 or something else. I am
all confused about who is the gatekeeper, who is the gateway. I just 
want * to register with the gatekeeper so they will pass * all the
incoming calls.

Which one do I use and how would I tackle the conf file to register
with the gatekeeper.

Any help would be appreciated. 

Steve Ducat.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
    <http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users>
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050901/ec69d055/attachment.htm