[Asterisk-Users] TDMoE and Badness in Kernel

[pbx at itsngroup.com]

I received some postings back, as I was trying to do the same thing.

it' is a problem with Kernel 2.6... 2.4 works fine .. this is the summary
I got from reading the posts before.

I hope that helps... I dont have the ability to go DOWn in kernel to 2.4..



> I'm going to poll the group one more time on this one. I have posted
> this before and didn't get any takers.
>
> Digium advises that I should just do IAX in place of TDMoE but I don't
> have that luxury. I have a very complex dial plan built around the TDMoE
> functionality and it would be very difficult/expensive to rewrite it.
> This has always worked excellent on 2.4 but now that we need to upgrade
> to 2.6 I'm getting all kinds of headaches. I'm willing to pay a
> consultant to work this out for me. Please contact me off list if
> interested....
>
> The following is my original message:
>
> "Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c on 2.6.X"
>
> I'm seeing this on Kernel 2.6.+ implementations, namely Centos 4.1, FC4
> machines while trying to do TDMoE trunks between two machines.
> 2.4 Kernel operates fine on the same hardware....
>
> I'm compiling zaptel-1.0.9.2 as per instructions in README.Linux26 +
> README.udev. I've also tried CVS head zaptel.
>
> Here are some references where the issue has been reported before but
> I've yet to find a documented solution;
>
> http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-February/091867.html
>
> http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5126
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>