[Asterisk-Users] Busy not jumping n + 101 anymore
brett at websmyths.com
brett at websmyths.com
Fri Oct 14 13:51:51 MST 2005
On 10/14/2005, "Jeremy Gault" <jgault at winworld.cc> wrote:
>brett at websmyths.com wrote:
>
>>On 10/14/2005, "William M. Sandiford" <wsandiford at DURHAMTELECOM.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Ever since this upgrade, the system is jumping n+101 if it gets a busy
>>>on a Dial command, it is now proceeding to the next priority (n+1)
>>>
>>>Has something changed with this? Is there a way to change it back?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>So glad to see you read the documentation...
>>
>>Try scanning UPGRADE.txt
>>
>>A lot has changed.
>>
>>
>We've had the same problem here ever since we upgraded to CVS-HEAD.
>When someone placed a call to a number that was busy, they would just
>receive the "call cannot be completed" recording we have setup at n+1.
>
>Not to sound nitpicky or hateful, but I just reviewed UPGRADE.txt again
>here and I don't see anything about it. If it is in there, could you
>please point it out to me? (Seriously, as I didn't see it.) If it
>isn't, someone with CVS access should probably add it in.
>
>Now, I will say that I'm assuming (from the new behavior and the "show
>application dial" output) that one should now be using the ${DIALSTATUS}
>variable to handle these conditions. (i.e. from your dial, make n+1 be a
>Goto(s-${DIALSTATUS}) command, and create s-BUSY, s-CONGESTION, etc. in
>the same context.) Once I get around to updating our dialplans, that's
>what I plan on doing.
>
>Someone please correct me if I am wrong. *dons asbestos armor, just in
>case*
No armor required...
I was wr-wr-wr-wrong... It is in extentions.conf. As mentioned by
others.
Well - I been wrong before... 8-)
Brett
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list