[Asterisk-Users] Busy not jumping n + 101 anymore
Jeremy Gault
jgault at winworld.cc
Fri Oct 14 13:22:52 MST 2005
brett at websmyths.com wrote:
>On 10/14/2005, "William M. Sandiford" <wsandiford at DURHAMTELECOM.com>
>wrote:
>
>
>
>>Ever since this upgrade, the system is jumping n+101 if it gets a busy
>>on a Dial command, it is now proceeding to the next priority (n+1)
>>
>>Has something changed with this? Is there a way to change it back?
>>
>>
>
>So glad to see you read the documentation...
>
>Try scanning UPGRADE.txt
>
>A lot has changed.
>
>
We've had the same problem here ever since we upgraded to CVS-HEAD.
When someone placed a call to a number that was busy, they would just
receive the "call cannot be completed" recording we have setup at n+1.
Not to sound nitpicky or hateful, but I just reviewed UPGRADE.txt again
here and I don't see anything about it. If it is in there, could you
please point it out to me? (Seriously, as I didn't see it.) If it
isn't, someone with CVS access should probably add it in.
Now, I will say that I'm assuming (from the new behavior and the "show
application dial" output) that one should now be using the ${DIALSTATUS}
variable to handle these conditions. (i.e. from your dial, make n+1 be a
Goto(s-${DIALSTATUS}) command, and create s-BUSY, s-CONGESTION, etc. in
the same context.) Once I get around to updating our dialplans, that's
what I plan on doing.
Someone please correct me if I am wrong. *dons asbestos armor, just in
case*
Jeremy
--
Jeremy Gault, KD4NED <jgault at winworld.cc>
Network Administrator, WinWorld Corporation
Member: Bradley County ACS/RACES/SkyWarn
voice: +1.423.473.8084 fax: +1.423.472.9465
Want a free GMail invite? E-Mail me and let me know!
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list