[Asterisk-Users] Don't know what to do if second ROSE componentis of type 0x6

[Jonathan k. Creasy]

I have been getting that message also. I have been using various
versions of CVS head since Feb. 2005. 

-Jonathan

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy
Gault
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 10:23 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Don't know what to do if second ROSE
componentis of type 0x6

FWIW, we are also seeing this message each time we receive a call.  I 
also went the Google route and found only questions, not answers.  We 
are running a PRI from US LEC (channels 1-10 are B-channels, with 
channel 24 being the D-channel, and we are only running voice on the 
PRI.)  The PRI is connected directly to our Digium TE110P card, and 
obviously we are using the zaptel drivers.

We did not see this message when running */zaptel/libpri 1.0.9.  
However, after upgrading (we went to 1.2.0-beta1 and now to CVS) we 
started seeing the message.  (I don't remember exactly if we saw it in 
the beta, but we do in the CVS.)

In our case, it does not seem to affect the stability of our * machine.

(However, bear in mind that you may be using parts of * that we do not, 
and the problem could lie in those parts.)  We're handling all PSTN 
calls via the PRI, except outbound to toll-free which are handed off to 
an IAX gateway on the Internet.  Our employees' desks are connected via 
the LAN (using Polycom 500/501 SIP phones.)  I have a remote extension 
at home (also SIP) using a Sipura SPA-2000.

We did have some stability issues (Asterisk would segfault) when we 
first moved to CVS.  Of course, safe_asterisk handled this and a couple 
of days later we updated again from CVS and it seemed to fix the 
stability issue we were having.

If you are using CVS (but not the latest one) you may want to try
upgrading.

I wouldn't worry about that message, though.  However, I would also be 
interested in knowing what it means/what causes it. :)

          Jeremy

Tom Rymes wrote:

>Has anyone figured out what this message means:
>
>Don't know what to do if second ROSE component is of type 0x6
>
>We are running a PRI through a Sangoma card that is handling the
>D-channel natively at this point, but we go the error when zaptel was
>handling the D-channel, too. I have googled, but all of the messages
are
>like this one with no answers that I can find. It's probably a
>non-issue, but we have been having issues with stability of our *
>install and I'd like to figure this out!
>
>Tom
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
>
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>  
>

-- 
Jeremy Gault, KD4NED    <jgault at winworld.cc>
Network Administrator, WinWorld Corporation
Member: Bradley County ACS/RACES/SkyWarn
voice: +1.423.473.8084  fax: +1.423.472.9465

Want a free GMail invite?  E-Mail me and let me know!

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users