[Asterisk-Users] IAX or IAX2 ?

[Tzafrir Cohen]

On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 02:36:02PM +0200, Stefan-Michael. Guenther (in-put GbR) wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> > From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir at cohens.org.il>
> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX or IAX2 ?
> >
> > IAX1 is probably hardly used anywhere. Chances are that where people
> > write IAX they mean IAX2
> >
> ok.
> 
> > > I have a working connection between two Asterisk-Servers (Asterisk
> > > 1.0.7-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC7k on Debian 3.1) via IAX.
> > > Does this connection work with IAX or IAX2?
> >
> > IAX2
> >
> ok.
> 
> > > When I try to load chan_iax2.so, I get the error message
> >
> > The channel name is iax. Yet it provides commands such that begin with
> > "iax2" and listens on port 4569.
> >
> ??? In /usr/lib/asterisk/modules the name of the file ist chan_iax2.so and as 
> far as I understood, I have to enter the file name in modules.conf, right?
> But if I do this, I get the error 
> 
> chan_iax2.so]Oct 11 10:09:52 WARNING[2288]: loader.c:258 
> ast_load_resource: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_iax2.so: undefined symbol: 
> ast_check_signature
> Oct 11 10:09:52 WARNING[2288]: loader.c:391 load_modules: Loading module 
> chan_iax2.so failed!

Are you sure that the file and the main asterisk binary are from the
same source (e.g: debian package)?

'apt-get install debsums' to verify checksums of files from debs.

> 
> during the start. 
> Well, so Asterisk is using IAX2 without an entry in modules.conf ?

It is configured by default to load all the modules in that directory.

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen         | tzafrir at jbr.cohens.org.il | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il |                           | a Mutt's  
tzafrir at cohens.org.il |                           |  best
ICQ# 16849755         |                           | friend