[Asterisk-Users] A rather big setup.

[Jan Saell]

if this is a brand new thing you can force the phones on people and then 
you can to provisioning remotly of for instance Grandstream so they can 
change the config themself. By forcing a common set of codex you can avoid 
cpu overhead of translation so you only have to think of teh datashuffle.

Bu doing god work at the dialpla you make shure that all the calls thats 
internal never hit the main pbx'es in the celler and oly use them for 
outgoing!

Best regards
jan

--On Monday, November 28, 2005 04:22:09 AM +0100 Vedran Dakic 
<java at it-review.net> wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> Those people currently aren't using any kind of phones, but the investment
> company that has this building "in the works" wants to deliver everything
> for them so they just have to - move in and do business.
>
> What worries me is the fact that when you have 100-200 offices - they're
> used to having 2-3 lines only for them - one for fax, two for voice, etc.
> So, in a way, having in mind around 200-300 outbound calls at peak time is
> pretty much "normal". Also, when you think of the number of phones - it
> would only be normal to assume for people to have up to 1000 internal
> phone conversations peak (the less transcoding - the better, of course).
>
> I have a freedom of making whatever I want, so I can have a separate LAN
> for VoIP purposes only - a bunch of dedicated patch panels, VLANs on Cisco
> switches, or whatever. I'm just considering this setup way before it has
> to go online because of the price of traditional PBX for this kind of
> setup which can only make you hurl. And you know how much potential
> upgrades cost for a setup like this - a traditional PBX can be a
> nightmare :(
>
> Cheers,
> Vedran.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Hans
> Witvliet Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 12:08 AM
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] A rather big setup.
>
> I think there is more to consider.
> One or two fat machines in the basement forr connecting to the PSTN is
> very fine.
> But are all the people allready using voip handsets, or old fashioned
> analoge handsets? If so, you need quite a large number of channelbanks.
> You speak of 300/1500 concurrent phone calls? If so how many handsets
> are you considering?
> Is the lan capable of handling this load?
> Is the lan 100% dedicated for voip, or are there a bunch of
> servers/workstations also using this lan?
>
> Interesting project....
>
> Hans
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



-- 
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
! Irial / YASK AB
! Att: Jan Saell
! Box 59, S-692 21 KUMLA, SWEDEN
! Tel: 019-58 25 15     Int +46-19 58 25 15     Fax +46-19 58 38 05
! E-mail: jan at irial.com
! PGP Fingerprint: E957 23C8 9F51 0958 B9AD  7F18 404A 5DA1 F944 A08B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20051127/18389cc7/attachment.pgp