[Asterisk-Users] A rather big setup.
Vedran Dakic
java at it-review.net
Sun Nov 27 20:27:34 MST 2005
I'm very aware of the maintenance issue, but it would also give me a great
deal of freedom for some various other
things as well. This of course depends on the Asterisk architecture, which
I'm not completely aware of - in detail
anyway.
How does Asterisk handle this kind of setup with one-two/cluster central
server(s) and a bunch of other servers
connected with IAX(2)? If you have local calls, do they go directly from
phone to phone, do they go from phone to
per-floor-Asterisk server, or they have to be interconnected via the main
Asterisk server(s)/cluster? I mean, there's
little point of doing this kind of setup with dedicated Asterisk servers on
each floor if you don't get your central
server/cluster free of some work - at least of internal calls. Also, it
kills scalability, which is always an "issue".
Anyone?
Cheers,
Vedran.
_____
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Script Head
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2005 11:13 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] A rather big setup.
Spreading * servers across multiple floors sounds like a bad idea since it'd
increase maintenance time. With your projected
call volume there's no way you can reliably run g729 or any other CPU hog of
a codec on a single box. For this kind of a
setup you'd need 2-3 boxes and a SER/heartbeat box to handle registration
and call distribution. I would also isolate CDR
recording to a separate box running a database like Postgres (IMHO better
choice due to WAL) or MySQL.
ScriptHead
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20051127/902973af/attachment.htm
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list