[Asterisk-Users] ATA verse Wildcard TDM400P

[Kerry Garrison]

I personally prefer a single-box solution with a TDM400 (although I am one
of the rare people who haven't had problems with the X100Ps I have put in).
My office uses an SPA-3000 on a phone line that has call forward on busy to
an iax.cc DID line, therefore I speak from experience with both types of
solutions.
 
Since I just happen to prefer a single box solution, I normally recommend
going with the TDM400.
 
In those cases where it is too inconvenient to get a phone to the server,
the SPA-3000 works just fine. I have been running this setup for several
months and it has been flawless.
 
So...in my opinion, its more of a matter of what is most appropriate for
your needs. If you have convenient access to a phone line, and may expand
past a single phone line, then the TDM400 makes more sense.
-Kerry
 

  _____  

From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of cp
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 7:25 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] ATA verse Wildcard TDM400P



I fed up with X100P clone card and want to spurge for a better solution.  I
do not need a router or firewall within this device and really just need
basic features. I am considering ATA adapters such as the Sipura 3000, Cisco
ATA,
<http://www.voipsupply.com/product_info.php?cPath=96_287&products_id=451>
Grandstream  488 or a Digium Wildcard TDM400P with one FXO. Does anyone have
direct experience with both ATA's and the TDM400P with one FXO port they
would share? Kind of Pro's and Con's on both solutions. You may reply off
list. I appreciate any suggestions and assistance. 

 

 

Thanks,

Chip

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20051122/dad2c3ae/attachment.htm