[Asterisk-Users] CentOS vs. Vanilla Kernel

[Julian Lyndon-Smith]

Not a problem that I've had :)

Linux foxtrot.tessera.co.uk 2.6.9-22.0.1.EL #1 Thu Oct 27 12:26:11 CDT 
2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy...
100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 
100.000000%
100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 
100.000000% 100.000000%
100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 100.000000% 
100.000000% 100.000000%
100.000000%
--- Results after 24 passes ---
Best: 100.000000 -- Worst: 100.000000 -- Average: 100.000000
[root at foxtrot zaptel]#

Julian.

tmassey at obscorp.com wrote:
> asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com wrote on 11/07/2005 01:17:31 PM:
> 
>> HW: HP DL360 1GB Ram Single 3GHz Pentium (with Hyper-threading turned 
> off).
>> OS: CentOS 4.2
>> Dual Embedded NIC enabled
>> USB disabled
>> serial disabled
>> printer disabled
>> 2x73GB SCSI in HW Raid 1
>>
>> What is the opinion of this fine list  - should I use the default CentOS 
> 
>> kernel (2.6.9-22.0.1.EL) or download from kernel.org the latest stable 
>> (2.6.14)
> 
> Will you be using Zaptel hardware?  The only way I can get zttest results 
> of 100% is with a CentOS 2.4 kernel.  Any CentOS 2.6 kernel I've tried 
> (Uni, SMP, with IOAPIC enabled or disabled) gave me 99.99% at best...
> 
> Tim Massey
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
> 
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users