[Asterisk-Users] VoiPSupply Dot Com

Tue May 31 12:00:25 MST 2005

Karl:

http://www.voipsupply.com/credit_authorization/

If you read the second paragraph it explains our policy as it refers to the
billing and shipping addresses.

"**PLEASE NOTE** If your billing address and shipping address are different
you should call your credit card company and have your shipping address
added as a valid address. If you do not do this your order may be delayed or
possibly cancelled."

This is where everyone is getting their information from.

Thanks,

Garrett Smith

<gsmith at voipsupply.com>

716-250-3408 Direct

716-903-9495 Cell

  _____  

From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Karl J.
Vesterling
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 12:30 PM
To: C F; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoiPSupply Dot Com

I'm amazed that this thread keeps going... 

About the claim of Ship-To being on file with bank...

CDW doesn't have a problem with it...  Ingram Micro doesn't have a problem
with it.  Merisel doesn't have a problem with it.  Digi-Key doesn't have a
problem with it...  Why would Voip-Supply???

We accept packages every day with the same Ship-To address specified to
Voip-Supply...

Additional comments dispursed throughout....

At 02:32 PM 5/27/2005, you wrote:

On 5/27/05, Karl J. Vesterling <kjv at ken-ton.com> wrote:
>  At 08:59 AM 5/27/2005, you wrote:
>  
> [ snip for brevity ]
>  I just wanted to clarify ... this isn't a voipsupply.com problem at all,
> but 
>  rather a courier screwup... which happens anywhere and at anytime...
right?
>  
>  TWO screw ups in the shipment.
>  1.) It was shipped to the Bill-To address.  Since there is no one there
> during the day I had to sit and wait for it lest it not be delivered.

This screw up has to do with the person that ordered it, because they
didn't have the ship to address on file with their bank.

This was not a paypal transaction.
The PO had BIG BOLD LETTERS - "Ship To:"

I'm unaware of any practices with the bank that requiring Ship-To addresses
to be on file with them.  
Perhaps your financial institution is a bit different?

>  2.) when an order is placed on a Tuesday AM (or) Monday PM, and it's
> priority overnight, and it's across town, and the tracking number was
> supplied on Wednesday one would expect that it would show up Thursday, not
> Friday.

See above, again this is a screw up that happened because of the one
that ordered it, by NOT having the ship to address on file with their
bank.

Where do you get this Ship-To on file w/ Bank idea?

Anyhow, you were already answered before that it had to do because YOU
didn't have the address on file with your bank. Why are you repeating
this lie that it is voipsupply.coms fault?
Be repeating it you make yourself look more like a politician or media
person, but certainly not someone that is in the electronic
engineering business. No I will not believe it because I read it
twice, so stop it.

No lie...  Fact.  There is a difference...

> 
>  So, what we have here is one problem compounded by another, none on
behalf
> of the courier.

Exactly, but on behalf of the ordered.

If you give a Ship-To address that is NOT on file with your bank, you
will NOT get it to that address, and it WILL delay shipping.

Gosh dang spin doctors...
Where does it state this???
Prove it.

Best Regards, 
Karl J. Vesterling
E-Mail: kjv at ken-ton.com

  _____  

Telephone:
Washington DC: (202) 448-3009 Extension 0
Annapolis MD: (240) 524-6706 Extension 0
Bethesda MD: (301) 576-3014 Extension 0
Niagara Falls NY: (716) 286-9175 Extension 0
Buffalo NY: (716) 608-1121 Extension 0 

  _____  

Yahoo Messenger: karl_vesterling
ICQ: 1548052
AOL Instant Messenger: n2vqm

  _____  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050531/36bee1d6/attachment.htm