[Asterisk-Users] VoiPSupply Dot Com

[Karl J. Vesterling]

I'm amazed that this thread keeps going...

About the claim of Ship-To being on file with bank...

CDW doesn't have a problem with it...  Ingram Micro doesn't have a problem 
with it.  Merisel doesn't have a problem with it.  Digi-Key doesn't have a 
problem with it...  Why would Voip-Supply???

We accept packages every day with the same Ship-To address specified to 
Voip-Supply...

Additional comments dispursed throughout....

At 02:32 PM 5/27/2005, you wrote:
>On 5/27/05, Karl J. Vesterling <kjv at ken-ton.com> wrote:
> >  At 08:59 AM 5/27/2005, you wrote:
> >
> > [ snip for brevity ]
> >  I just wanted to clarify ... this isn't a voipsupply.com problem at all,
> > but
> >  rather a courier screwup... which happens anywhere and at anytime... 
> right?
> >
> >  TWO screw ups in the shipment.
> >  1.) It was shipped to the Bill-To address.  Since there is no one there
> > during the day I had to sit and wait for it lest it not be delivered.
>
>This screw up has to do with the person that ordered it, because they
>didn't have the ship to address on file with their bank.

This was not a paypal transaction.
The PO had BIG BOLD LETTERS - "Ship To:"

I'm unaware of any practices with the bank that requiring Ship-To addresses 
to be on file with them.
Perhaps your financial institution is a bit different?


> >  2.) when an order is placed on a Tuesday AM (or) Monday PM, and it's
> > priority overnight, and it's across town, and the tracking number was
> > supplied on Wednesday one would expect that it would show up Thursday, not
> > Friday.
>
>See above, again this is a screw up that happened because of the one
>that ordered it, by NOT having the ship to address on file with their
>bank.

Where do you get this Ship-To on file w/ Bank idea?


>Anyhow, you were already answered before that it had to do because YOU
>didn't have the address on file with your bank. Why are you repeating
>this lie that it is voipsupply.coms fault?
>Be repeating it you make yourself look more like a politician or media
>person, but certainly not someone that is in the electronic
>engineering business. No I will not believe it because I read it
>twice, so stop it.

No lie...  Fact.  There is a difference...

> >
> >  So, what we have here is one problem compounded by another, none on behalf
> > of the courier.
>
>Exactly, but on behalf of the ordered.
>
>If you give a Ship-To address that is NOT on file with your bank, you
>will NOT get it to that address, and it WILL delay shipping.

Gosh dang spin doctors...
Where does it state this???
Prove it.



Best Regards,
Karl J. Vesterling
E-Mail: kjv at ken-ton.com

----------
Telephone:
Washington DC: (202) 448-3009 Extension 0
Annapolis MD: (240) 524-6706 Extension 0
Bethesda MD: (301) 576-3014 Extension 0
Niagara Falls NY: (716) 286-9175 Extension 0
Buffalo NY: (716) 608-1121 Extension 0

----------
Yahoo Messenger: karl_vesterling
ICQ: 1548052
AOL Instant Messenger: n2vqm

----------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050531/fead46a0/attachment.htm