[Asterisk-Users] My experience with our VS-1 Asterisk server
Anthony Gagliardo
anthony at pcaginc.net
Fri May 13 08:25:44 MST 2005
I own and operate a number of franchised Sylvan Learning Centers where
I recently upgraded to an all VOIP phone system (Asterisk) with one
VS-1 and about 25 extensions scattered around the country. I had
originally setup a Dell 420 SC but the Dell had incurable buss issues
with single span and quad span T1 cards. I wasted a LOT of time trying
to get the Dell to work and finally gave up on it and bought a VS-1
from thevoipconnection.com which has worked great right out of the box
for about a month now . We connect to our T1 using Digium's T110TE
which works great. I would be happy to answer questions by email or
phone about my experience with our VS-1.
Anthony Gagliardo
501-765-0229
Message: 21
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 22:37:08 -0400
From: "The VoIP Connection" <asterisk-biz at thevoipconnection.com>
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] * Server
To: "'snacktime'" <snacktime at gmail.com>, "'Asterisk Users Mailing List
- Non-Commercial Discussion'" <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Message-ID: <20050513023650.5A6E7FC0D3 at lists.digium.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Chris,
Obviously we can't publish a list of our customers on this or any other
news
group, but if you would like some references we would be happy to
provide
them. I know some of them are on the list, maybe they will be kind
enough
to share their opinions.
The VS-1 has been performing flawlessly in production at numerous
locations
for over a year now, and it should continue to do so for many more. The
reason we don't specify an Asterisk version on our web site and data
sheet
is that the "marketing hype" for the VS-1 pre-dates Version 1.0. The
latest
VS-1 comes with two versions of Asterisk installed: One is a "stable"
version (currently 1.0.7), the other is a "development" version which is
built from CVS head and the occasional assorted patches. The management
interface allows the administrator to easily select which of the two
versions of Asterisk ("stable" or "development")they wish to run.
Either
version can be updated or modified by the administrator should they
choose
to.
Since the door has been opened, I'll offer up a little more "hype":
Unlike some other "turn-key" products, the VS-1 is not an attempt to
dumb
down or obfuscate Asterisk. It is not impaired or restricted in any
way.
Our web management interface is a layer on top of the standard
configuration
file interface and it does not interfere with or overwrite direct edits
to
the files. The system comes with most of the popular functionality
pre-configured: voicemail, festival, moh, meetme, FOP, etc. and also
includes a number of other tools and utilities that ease setup, phone
provisioning and remote administration.
Like a lot of good technology, the VS-1 is 1% inspiration and 99%
perspiration. A significant amount of engineering has gone into this
unassuming little black box. It is designed for stability and
reliability
as opposed to ultra high performance, but with limited transcoding it
can
easily handle a full T1 of PRI. It's also pre-configured for several
popular
VoIP service providers and it gets along just fine with a TDM400P card.
We
stand behind it with a one year replacement warrantee and 30 day money
back
guarantee.
Michael Crown
Managing Partner
www.thevoipconnection.com
321.989.6728 ext. 611
sip:611 at voiceserver.thevoipconnection.com
-----Original Message-----
From: snacktime [mailto:snacktime at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 4:04 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] * Server
On 5/12/05, Montague, Clarence <Clarence.Montague at onstar.com> wrote:
>
>
> Any reviews/comments out there on this server? Looks solid.. But would
> like to know if anyone has purchased one of these before. Any other
> companies out there offer pre-built * servers that someone would like
> to
comment on?
>
> http://www.thevoipconnection.com/store/catalog/product_16214_VS1trade_
> Asterisk_Voice_Server.html
Personally I would want to see the full specifications and get some more
information about it's track record in production use.
If this unit was vouched for by some recognized names that have used it
in
production, and if they stated what version of asterisk was used
instead of
just saying it's their own 'certified' version, I might be inclined to
say
it looks like a good deal for a small business or office environment.
As is
it seems short on details and long on marketing hype.
Chris
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list