[Asterisk-Users] Re: Zapata.Conf Sanity Check

[Tony Mountifield]

In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0505060740100.30923-100000 at nucleus.nacs.net>,
Greg Boehnlein <damin at nacs.net> wrote:
> Hello,
> 	Haven't had a chance to test this configuration yet, so I can't 
> really answer my own question, but wanted to get a couple of eyeballs to 
> look at it and verify that I'm going to get the behavior that I expect out 
> of it. Basically, I have a TE405P w/ 3 PRI to the Telco and one going to a 
> legacy PBX, all speaking NI-2 (National ISDN 2). I need to use "pri_cpe" 
> w/ the Telco and "pri_net" for the PBX, and I want them in different 
> groups. I hacked the following up last night, while falling asleep, and 
> I'm pretty sure it will do what I want, but I'd like a second opinion.
> 
> ; Zapata telephony interface
> ;
> ; Configuration file
> 
> [channels]
> ; Inbound PRI from Telco
> context=inbound
> switchtype=national
> signalling=pri_cpe
> group=1    
> channel => 1-23,25-47,49-71
> 
> ; Outbound PRI to PBX
> context=pbx
> switchtype = national
> signalling = pri_net
> group = 2
> channel => 73-95
> 
> Thanks..

Looks fine to me too.

Cheers
Tony
-- 
Tony Mountifield
Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org