[Asterisk-Users] FXO ATA?

[Gregory Wiktor - ADCom Corp.]

Why not go with Multitech?   They are expensive, but great units.

Greg 

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Michael
George
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 6:37 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FXO ATA?

I've been looking at something similar, but with more ports.  Something
to handle the incoming (FXO) analog lines, but without the investment in
a channel bank and T1 card because we only need 4-8 FXOs and no FXS.

I've looked at the AudioCodes MP104 which looks like it will take the
FXOs and turn them into SIP channels.

Anyone have experience with these?  Maybe my lack of experience is
causing incorrect expectations.

While they are pricey (~$1,000US), they are still cheaper than a T1 card
and a channel bank I think.

On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 08:07:14AM -0400, Chris Mason (Lists) wrote:
> Is the Sipura 3000 the only way to interface a remote pstn line and 
> connect incoming calls to Asterisk? I have a location connected by 
> network that has a phone line, when the room is occupied I want the 
> line ti ring there as normal, but when the employee is travelling I 
> want the line to be conencted to a ATA that then feeds it as an 
> incoming pstn line to the pbx located at my office so it can follow
her.
> It sounds like the Sipura 3000 would be perfect, what else would do
it?

--
-M

There are 10 kinds of people in this world:
	Those who can count in binary and those who cannot.
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users