[Asterisk-Users] Re: Problems with TDM400P card
Rich Adamson
radamson at routers.com
Thu May 5 09:49:41 MST 2005
> >>>I am new to Asterisk, but so far, having looked at this thread (which is
> >>>quite long and full of lot's of hard work), the zttest code, the Digium web site,
> >>>and the spandsp website, and having talked to Digium sales/support about
> >>>the TDM, I think the issue belongs the spandsp community. They may be
> >>>able to point out an improvement to the TDM product that Digium may or
> >>>may not implement. Or they may need to adapt to an improvement on new TDM
> >>>cards. It does not appear that Digium has promised support to
> >>>the spandsp add-on function to Asterisk. I also didn't see where the spandsp
> >>>project was committed to staying up to date with each new revision of
> >>>TDM card - that's what the community is for.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Then you think wrong. This is totally unrelated to spandsp. Any FAX
> >>machine, modem, or other timing critical device has the same problems
> >>with these cards. Something is broken, and since it used to work OK with
> >>the hardware I am using now I assume it is the TDM driver.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Steve, is there anyway that you might be able to help us out to identify
> >the source of the issues? I'd really really love to get spandsp working
> >with the TDM card; pretty please!
> >
> >I can give you remote access to a machine with the latest TDM card in
> >it if you need.
> >
> >
> Well, I was thinking of writing a test something like this.
>
> - don't plug anything into the TDM card, so the hybrid echo will be
> maximised.
> - send and receive audio, so the echo of the transmitted signal will be
> received.
> - send a signal where phase hops will show up easily, and look for any
> hops in the received signal.
>
> This could run quite simply, and report every hiccup. I still need
> something more general purpose to ease support issues, though. The main
> support activity I have with spandsp is dealing with people who have
> slips. Despite trying to publicise the issue adequately, they still
> bother me with the problem and feel they absolutely must have things
> right. Well, the reality is many have E1/T1 lines with the clocking set
> wrong, and I need some automated test to identify those. The reality is
> also that many people having inadequate hardware, or are running X11 and
> loosing interrupts. I also need an automated test to find those. Lastly,
> people with TDM cards just have trouble, and we need to sort this out.
> It seems without a simple repeatable way to show up the problem, it
> isn't going to be fixed.
As maybe a starting point, having something that would ID the TDM issue
would be very useful. The clock sync on T1/E1's (and X11) could come later
as there is at least some manual ways to identify those issues for now.
Need access to a system with the TDM?
Rich
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list