[Asterisk-Users] BSD Compatability
snacktime
snacktime at gmail.com
Mon May 2 21:55:36 MST 2005
On 5/2/05, trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com <trixter at 0xdecafbad.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 00:06 -0400, skamp wrote:
> > asterisk runs great on BSD if you follow the sirections, and the card i
> > believe does work
>
> That is debateable :) First which bsd? FreeBSD 4.x for example doesnt
> compile becuase of the zaptel stuff, however 5.x does (from ports
> anyway). In FBSD 5.x the translation times between codecs is higher
> than a *slower* linux box (again fbsd 5.x ports vs 1.0.7 stable from the
> debian sarge repository). The speed difference in cpu was roughly 2x
> faster for fbsd (without anything running no load to speak of) and
> translation times were 1.5 longer than the linux box. I was amazed at
> that becuase I see no reason why the os would matter for that. Maybe
> its just a display error from the CLI, where values were miscalculated
> and stored and then when displayed incorrect.
Here is the translation table from a dell poweredge 2650/3.06 mhz
running fbsd 5.4-stable.
g723 gsm ulaw alaw g726 adpcm slin lpc10 g729 speex ilbc
g723 - - - - - - - - - - -
gsm - - 2 2 3 2 1 4 8 23 12
ulaw - 3 - 1 3 2 1 4 8 23 12
alaw - 3 1 - 3 2 1 4 8 23 12
g726 - 4 3 3 - 3 2 5 9 24 13
adpcm - 3 2 2 3 - 1 4 8 23 12
slin - 2 1 1 2 1 - 3 7 22 11
lpc10 - 3 2 2 3 2 1 - 8 23 12
g729 - 3 2 2 3 2 1 4 - 23 12
speex - 3 2 2 3 2 1 4 8 - 12
ilbc - 3 2 2 3 2 1 4 8 23 -
I'm running the zaptel ztdummy and * from 04/08/05 cvs head. Haven't
had any issues at all, but I'm not doing a lot of traffic either.
Chris
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list