[Asterisk-Users] Comprehensive Asterisk Load Testing

Zoa zoachien at securax.org
Wed Mar 30 07:42:42 MST 2005


Its a very very bad idea to do this on production boxes. Especially if
you are trying to see how far you can go, and then you cross that tiny
border :)

Your production calls will not like an idle cpu% of 0% and a load of 500.

zoa,


Bicom Systems wrote:

>asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com wrote:
>
>
>>Hey,
>>
>>Most of the time you dont need a big machine to test a small machine.
>>Just make sure there is no transcoding on the sending end.
>>I did all the tests you mentioned (Except for the jitter buffer) on a
>>dual xeon and a via c3.
>>
>>That took me about 2 months fulltime (its a lot harder than it looks),
>>you can find some of the results on www.astertest.com (there you will
>>find also some imature version of a callgenerator for asterisk that
>>would probably help you to do things faster).
>>I could also help you off list if you want.
>>
>>
>>
>Zoa..
>
>Have you done the test using call generator on test or production boxes?
>
>Ta
>Senad
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050330/45c68be2/signature.pgp


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list