[Asterisk-Users] CIC Code

[James Taylor]

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:45:50 -0600 (CST), Dave Weis <djweis at sjdjweis.com>  
wrote:

>
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Jason Miller wrote:
>> Do you remember what you actually changed to make it work cause that is  
>> the
>> same switch that I am dealing with myself if I am not mistaken.
>
> Approximately line 1673 in chan_zap.c, it looks like this:
>
>                  if (p->sig == SIG_FEATD) {
>                          l = ast->cid.cid_num;
>                          if (l)
>                                  snprintf(p->dop.dialstr,  
> sizeof(p->dop.dialstr), "T*%s*%s*", l, c + p->stripmsd);
>                          else
>                                  snprintf(p->dop.dialstr,  
> sizeof(p->dop.dialstr), "T**%s*", c + p->stripmsd);
>                  } else
>                  if (p->sig == SIG_FEATDMF) {
>                          l = ast->cid.cid_num;
>                          if (l)
>                                  snprintf(p->dop.dialstr,  
> sizeof(p->dop.dialstr), "M*00%s#*%s#", l, c + p->stripmsd);
>                          else
>                                  snprintf(p->dop.dialstr,  
> sizeof(p->dop.dialstr), "M*02#*%s#", c + p->stripmsd);
>                  } else
>
>
> The switch tech told me that the 00 indicates operator assistance on  
> their switch, he thought 01 or the 02 in the next line was more correct.  
> Also, the * and # aren't called * and #, I found out that the switch  
> tech laughs at you. :-) They are KP and ST.
>
> One strange thing is that asterisk seemed to be putting pauses in the  
> dial string. In zaptel.c on line 2502 I inserted a printk to look at the  
> final dial string. There were pauses inserted in the dial string. It  
> would be nice if monitor could get audio during the dialing instead of  
> just after answer.
>
> dave
>
>
The information digits "00" are for a POTS line, the "02" is for ANI  
failure.
See them all at:
http://www.nanpa.com/number_resource_info/ani_ii_assignments.html



>>>> From: Dave Weis <djweis at sjdjweis.com>>>> Reply-To: Asterisk Users  
>>>> Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>>> <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:23:35 -0600 (CST)
>>> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>>> <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] CIC Code
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Jason Miller wrote:
>>>> Has anyone ever setup Asterisk to pass Feature Group D access while  
>>>> using a
>>>> CIC code for outbound calls? If so can you please email the  
>>>> configuration
>>>> you have done? I have tried to get this up and running but with no  
>>>> luck. I
>>>> have also contacted support and I cant seem to get this going.
>>>
>>> I got it working briefly. I had to talk with the switch techs at the  
>>> other
>>> end for a couple hours and modify the source code to reformat what was
>>> being sent down the line. Their definition of FGD and asterisk's
>>> definition were not the same. It was a nortel DMS-100 or 250 set up for
>>> CLASS 4.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Asterisk-Users mailing list
>>> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Asterisk-Users mailing list
>> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>



-- 
James Taylor
MetroTel
3505 Summerihll Road
Suite 11
Texarkana, Texas  75503
903-793-1956